Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
alexithymia

Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ-S) Test

Take the online Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ-S) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ-S) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Completed in about two minutes, the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ-S) Test contains six questions about recognising, naming, and attending to emotions. Your result highlights the level of difficulty you may experience with emotional awareness and communication, offering a concise starting point for self-reflection and understanding your emotional profile.
Questions: 62 minutes
Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ-S): test ticket with numbers
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
19,098 views
1,396 completions
1,087 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,087 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Alexithymia ScaleAS
Measures difficulty identifying and describing one’s emotions, with higher scores reflecting greater challenges in emotional awareness and expression.
example score17/42
17/42Lower difficultyexample score
6 – 17Lower difficulty
18 – 29Moderate difficulty
30 – 42Higher difficulty
A score of 17 falls in the Lower difficulty range, suggesting relatively few problems recognizing and communicating emotions compared with higher scores.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People feeling emotionally numb
41%OF USERS
They often know something is wrong but struggle to identify or put words to what they feel, whether it’s stress, sadness, or joy.
Teens learning self-awareness
33%OF USERS
Adolescents take it to better understand confusing emotions and communicate their feelings more clearly with others.
Clients in counseling or therapy
26%OF USERS
They use it as a quick check-in to map difficulties recognizing and describing emotions and to guide next steps in support.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Alexithymia ScaleAS
You?
Average15.3
Typical rangeTypical10.9 – 19.8
Possible6 – 42
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

This questionnaire is designed to assess how emotions are perceived and experienced. Please rate the following statements according to the extent to which you agree or disagree that each statement is true for you. Some statements refer to negative or unpleasant emotions, such as sadness, anger, or fear. Other statements refer to positive or pleasant emotions, such as happiness, amusement, or joyful excitement.
    • Strongly disagree
    • ...
    • ...
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • ...
    • ...
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • ...
    • ...
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • ...
    • ...
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • ...
    • ...
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • ...
    • ...
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ-S) Test - Description and methodology of the test

alexithymia
autism

For readers who want to understand recurring difficulty with their own feelings, the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ-S) Test offers a focused way to examine emotional awareness and communication. An alexithymia self-assessment can help when emotions feel vague, hard to name, or easy to dismiss. The result gives a concise profile of the tendency represented by these questions, supporting reflection on how you experience and express feelings.

What This Assessment Measures

The questionnaire examines how readily a person notices, distinguishes, and describes emotions. Its items cover unpleasant feelings such as sadness, anger, and fear, alongside pleasant experiences such as happiness, excitement, and amusement. They also ask whether feelings receive attention or are ignored. This makes the emotional awareness test relevant when inner states feel unclear or difficult to communicate.

The result is organised around one displayed scale:

  • The Alexithymia Scale, scored from 6-42, measures difficulty identifying and describing one’s own emotions. Lower difficulty covers 6-17, Moderate difficulty covers 18-29, and Higher difficulty covers 30-42; higher scores indicate greater impairment in emotional awareness and emotional communication.

Scores describe the difficulty captured by the items, not a permanent identity or complete account of emotional functioning. The result is most useful as a current self-report profile, read alongside situations in which emotions become hard to recognise, name, or attend to.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement is answered on a seven-point agreement scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, with a neutral midpoint. The method for converting responses into the displayed score is unspecified; results are interpreted through the displayed bands without inferring item weights or a summation rule.

The structure is consistent with the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire-Short Form (Preece et al., 2023), a brief published measure of alexithymia. It also aligns conceptually with the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire and its attention-appraisal model, which distinguish attending to feelings from identifying and describing them. This PAQ-S questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, not presented as a separately validated adaptation of the published instruments.

Research on the source measure includes psychometric evaluation and a later study in a clinical sample, giving the published PAQ-S a defined evidence base. That evidence belongs to the published measure, while this online presentation should be read as a self-report profile rather than as a newly standardised instrument. Current mood, context, self-awareness, and willingness to report inner experience can shape answers, so persistent or disruptive difficulties may require broader assessment.

Author: David Preece, Graeme J. Taylor, James D. A. Parker
Literature:
  • Preece, D. A., Mehta, A., Petrova, K., Sikka, P., Bjureberg, J., Chen, W., Becerra, R., Allan, A., Robinson, K., & Gross, J. J. (2023). The Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire-Short Form (PAQ-S): A 6-item measure of alexithymia. Journal of Affective Disorders, 325, 493-501. 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.036
  • Heekerens, J. B., Preece, D. A., & Gross, J. J. (2026). The Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire-Short Form (PAQ-S): Psychometric properties in a clinical sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 254, 113654. 10.1016/j.paid.2026.113654
  • Preece, D., Becerra, R., Robinson, K., Dandy, J., & Allan, A. (2018). The psychometric assessment of alexithymia: Development and validation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 132, 32-44. 10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.011
  • Preece, D., Becerra, R., Allan, A., Robinson, K., & Dandy, J. (2017). Establishing the theoretical components of alexithymia via factor analysis: Introduction and validation of the attention-appraisal model of alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 341-352. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.003

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment