Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
misandry

Misandry Scale Test

Take the online Misandry Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Misandry Scale Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In about seven minutes, the Misandry Scale Test guides you through 36 questions about attitudes, stereotypes, and judgments concerning men. Your result indicates the level of negative attitudes reflected in your responses, offering a structured starting point for self-reflection about gender-related beliefs and possible bias.
Questions: 367 minutes
Misandry Scale Test: agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
32,566 views
4,732 completions
2,917 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,917 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

MisandryM
Measures the intensity of negative stereotypes, distrust, and hostile attitudes toward men as a social group.
example score40/100
40/100Moderateexample score
0 – 33Low
34 – 66Moderate
67 – 100High
A score of 40 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting some negative beliefs about men are present but are not strongly pervasive.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Gender bias researchers
41%OF USERS
Researchers and students use it to quantify women’s negative stereotypes about men for studies on gender attitudes and social prejudice.
Counselors and psychologists
34%OF USERS
Mental health professionals use it to screen for hostile or distrustful views toward men that may affect relationships and therapy goals.
Women seeking self-insight
25%OF USERS
Women take it to check whether frustration, suspicion, or resentment toward men has become a stable bias and how strongly it shows up right now.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Misandry Measurement ScaleMMS
You?
Average66.8
Typical rangeTypical52.7 – 80.9
Possible0 – 100
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Misandry Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

misandry
sexism

People who want to examine their own beliefs about men may use the Misandry Scale Test as a structured reflection on gender-related attitudes. It suits readers examining broad judgments about men, including beliefs that may feel familiar or socially justified. The result indicates the level of negative attitudes toward men expressed through broad comparisons and generalizations. A misandry assessment can highlight beliefs worth examining without reducing them to a single explanation.

What This Assessment Explores

Across the items, the misandry questionnaire compares women and men in relational, family, and social settings. For self-reflection, the result can reveal stereotypes or bias shaping these broad judgments.

The statements cover four thematic areas:

  • Comparative judgments show whether the respondent sees women as more moral, capable, organized, or responsible.
  • Threat and conduct beliefs indicate whether men are linked with violence, crime, deception, infidelity, irritability, or selfishness.
  • Family and social roles reveal views of male leadership, breadwinning, custody, domestic work, and changing expectations.
  • Masculinity stereotypes capture views of men as passive, immature, detached, appearance-focused, or lacking traditional qualities.

Results show the Misandry scale from 0-100: Low 0-33, Moderate 34-66, High 67-100. The result reflects negative attitudes toward men in these answers and may highlight stereotypes or bias for self-reflection, but cannot explain their source or influence behavior.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement uses a seven-point agreement response, moving from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with a midpoint. Some choices use completely rather than strongly, but they serve the same ordered response format. The selected answers are combined into the displayed Misandry score; weighting, reverse-keying, and the item-level formula are not specified, so they should not be inferred from the range.

Misandry Scale (Pyatkova & Savinskaya, 2020) is the closest conceptual source for this test of attitudes toward men. It examines normative perceptions of negative attitudes toward men, while Malmi (2009) and Nathanson and Young (2006) place related stereotypes and discrimination in social and institutional contexts. These works support interpretation of the themes, not a claim that this online questionnaire is identical to, adapted from, or validated by them.

The displayed bands are result categories rather than population norms. Self-report scores can shift with current experiences, social desirability, and how respondents distinguish broad generalizations from specific situations. Read the result as an indicator of attitudes expressed in these answers, not as a diagnosis or complete account of a person’s beliefs.

Author: Janet Shibley Hyde, Peter Glick
Literature:
  • Pyatkova, E. S., and Savinskaya, O. B. (2020). Normative perceptions of misandry among two generations of women. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, no. 2, pp. 252-272. 10.14515/monitoring.2020.2.679
  • Malmi, P. (2009). Discrimination against Men: Appearance and Causes in the Context of a Modern Welfare State. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press.
  • Nathanson, P., and Young, K. K. (2006). Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination against Men. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 10.1515/9780773559998

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment