Spiritual Meaning Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly agree
Spiritual Meaning Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who are reflecting on purpose, direction, or spiritual significance may use the Spiritual Meaning Scale Test to organize these questions into a self-report profile. It is suited to anyone curious about how they currently experience meaning, calling, and connection beyond the self. The result offers a structured starting point for reflection rather than a fixed description of identity. A spiritual meaning questionnaire can make these themes easier to examine.
What This Assessment Explores
The items examine how a person understands purpose, direction, contribution, spiritual connection, and meaning in difficult experiences. They also touch on perceived guidance, a sense of being called, and beliefs about belonging to something greater. A meaning in life test like this describes current self-perception, not an unchanging identity.
The result is organized into two scales:
- Calling (7-35) reflects the subjective experience of having a life calling. The displayed bands-Low calling (7-17), Moderate calling (18-30), and High calling (31-35)-indicate increasing strength from an insufficient or absent sense of calling to a stronger sense of purpose or mission.
- Meaningfulness (7-35) reflects perceived meaning and purpose in life. The displayed bands-Low meaningfulness (7-17), Moderate meaningfulness (18-31), and High meaningfulness (32-35)-indicate a range from difficulty finding or experiencing meaning to stronger perceived meaning.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement is answered on a five-point agreement scale, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. The wording addresses calling, meaning, guidance, connection, and responses to uncertainty or difficulty. The questionnaire reports results on two scales rather than treating the topic as one global impression. The displayed bands describe the results: a higher result represents more of the tendency named by its scale definition.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Spiritual Meaning Scale (Mascaro et al., 2004), a published measure of spiritual meaning, and its broader interpretation fits Park’s account of religion and meaning (2013). The online version is a self-report questionnaire, and its standardization or validation as an adaptation is not established. It therefore functions as a spiritual meaning assessment for noticing patterns in current beliefs and experiences.
Self-report results can shift with mood, life events, personal spirituality, and how readily someone describes inner experience. The displayed low, moderate, and high bands describe the profile; interpretation should also consider the respondent’s current beliefs about purpose, guidance, connection, and meaning in difficulty, which may change as circumstances develop.
- Mascaro, Nathan, David H. Rosen, and Leslie C. Morey. (2004). The development, construct validity, and clinical utility of the spiritual meaning scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 845-860. 10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.011
- Park, Crystal L. (2013). Religion and meaning. In Raymond F. Paloutzian and Crystal L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 357-379). Guilford Press.
Updated: