Revised Paranormal Belief Scale (RPBS) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Don't know / not sure
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Don't know / not sure
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Don't know / not sure
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Revised Paranormal Belief Scale (RPBS) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how they respond to supernatural, religious, and extraordinary claims may find the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale (RPBS) Test useful as a structured self-report profile. The profile organizes endorsement across paranormal and religious themes. As an RPBS self-assessment, it shows how responses cluster by subject and contribute to an overall tendency.
What This Assessment Measures
This RPBS questionnaire reports dimensions and bands:
- Precognition (4-28) measures foresight: Low belief 4-12; Moderate belief 13-20; High belief 21-28.
- Extraordinary Life Forms (3-21) measures unusual beings: Low belief 3-8; Moderate belief 9-15; High belief 16-21.
- Spiritualism (4-28) measures afterlife: Low 4-11; Moderate 12-20; High 21-28.
- Superstition (3-21) measures omens: Low 3-9; Moderate 10-15; High 16-21.
- Witchcraft (4-28) measures magic: Low belief 4-11; Moderate belief 12-19; High belief 20-28.
- Psi Abilities (4-28) assess telepathy: Low belief 4-12; Moderate belief 13-20; High belief 21-28.
- Traditional Religious Belief (4-28) measures religion: Low 4-12; Moderate 13-20; High 21-28.
- Paranormal Belief (26-182) measures endorsement: Low 26-78; Moderate 79-130; High 131-182.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item offers seven ordered responses from strongly disagree to strongly agree, with a middle uncertainty option. The format records degree of endorsement, not a yes-or-no position. Responses form domain scores and an overall total; higher scores indicate stronger endorsement within a domain or across the questionnaire. The displayed bands describe lower, middle, or higher endorsement in this measure.
Methodologically, the online form is conceptually consistent with the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale (RPBS) (Tobacyk, 2004), the published instrument supplying its closest framework. Drinkwater et al. (2017) examined dimensional structure; Dagnall et al. (2023) evaluated temporal stability and predictive validity; Lange et al. (2000) investigated item purification. Their findings do not establish that this online version shares the published instrument’s wording, factor structure, reliability, norms, or validity.
The questionnaire records how strongly a person endorses paranormal claims and produces a paranormal belief profile; it does not establish whether those claims are true. The result reflects current self-reported endorsement and may vary with context, interpretation of the statements, self-awareness, and candour.
- Tobacyk, Jerome J. (2004). A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23(1), 94-98. 10.24972/ijts.2004.23.1.94
- Drinkwater, Kenneth, Andrew Denovan, Neil Dagnall, and Andrew Parker (2017). An Assessment of the Dimensionality and Factorial Structure of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1693. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01693
- Dagnall, Neil, Andrew Denovan, and Kenneth Graham Drinkwater (2023). Longitudinal Assessment of the Temporal Stability and Predictive Validity of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1094701. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1094701
- Lange, Rense, Harvey J. Irwin, and James Houran (2000). Top-Down Purification of Tobacyk’s Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(1), 131-156. 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00183-X
Updated: