Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Definitely yes
- Yes, rather than no
- No, rather than yes
- Definitely no
- Definitely yes
- More yes than no
- More no than yes
- Definitely not
- Definitely yes
- Yes, rather than no
- No, rather than yes
- Definitely no
Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who wonder whether smartphone habits are interfering with concentration, sleep, relationships, or responsibilities can use the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) Test as a structured self-report check. It focuses on patterns of reliance and difficulty regulating use, giving a result that places the measured tendency in a Low, Moderate, or High range. As a smartphone addiction questionnaire, it supports focused reflection on everyday behavior.
What This Assessment Explores
Items address more than time spent on a device. They ask about missed responsibilities, concentration, sleep, physical discomfort, emotional reliance, separation-related irritation, online relationships, repeated checking, and failed attempts to cut back. Together, these situations reflect excessive use and fear of being without the device, with possible psychological, behavioral, and self-efficacy consequences.
For someone using this as a smartphone addiction test, the result shows whether device use feels difficult to regulate. One Smartphone Addiction scale runs from 0-99: Low 0-33, Moderate 34-66, and High 67-99.
The main result themes can be understood through these groups:
- Daily functioning captures disruption to work, study, sleep, and physical comfort.
- Emotional reliance reflects rewarding use and distress when access is limited.
- Online orientation describes preference for digital relationships and smartphone-mediated contact.
- Loss of control covers checking, prolonged use, tolerance, and unsuccessful attempts to cut back.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement in this form uses four ordered self-report choices, usually ranging from definite or stronger agreement to definite or stronger disagreement. The catalogue reports one composite score and three bands, but no item-by-item weighting rule; individual point values should not be inferred from the answer labels. The displayed bands are catalogue categories, not independently established diagnostic cutoffs.
The evidence base is the published Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS), a 33-item instrument developed through factor analysis around six domains. The original study used a six-point response scale and found strong internal consistency and associations with related measures, but relied on a small, non-random Korean adult sample. Its findings do not automatically validate every population or this online format.
Later U.S. research by Harris, McCredie, and Fields found high consistency and concurrent validity among emerging adults, while the six-factor structure was not well replicated. For a smartphone addiction assessment, the overall band is therefore more defensible than treating each theme as a separate clinical score. Current stress, sleep, workload, self-awareness, and honest reporting can affect responses; read the result as reported severity, not a diagnosis.
- Kwon M, Lee J-Y, Won W-Y, Park J-W, Min J-A, Hahn C, Gu X, Choi J-H, and Kim D-J. (2013). Development and Validation of a Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS). PLOS ONE, 8(2), e56936. 10.1371/journal.pone.0056936
- Harris B, McCredie M, and Fields S. (2020). Examining the psychometric properties of the Smartphone Addiction Scale and its short version for use with emerging adults in the U.S. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1, 100011. 10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100011
Updated: