Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
sport

Attitude Toward the Upcoming Competition Scale Test

Take the online Attitude Toward the Upcoming Competition Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Attitude Toward the Upcoming Competition Scale Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 28 yes-or-no questions taking about 6 minutes, the Attitude Toward the Upcoming Competition Scale Test helps athletes explore their perceived readiness, confidence, view of opponents, and motivation before an event. Results offer a focused profile for self-reflection and identifying psychological factors that may shape competitive preparation.
Questions: 286 minutes
Attitude Toward the Upcoming Competition: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
16,771 view
1,643 completions
1,361 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,361 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Reflected Self-EsteemRSE
Mirror self-esteem reflects how the athlete believes others evaluate their abilities, where higher scores indicate lower self-esteem.
example score3/7
3/7Moderate mirror self-esteemexample score
0 – 2High mirror self-esteem
3 – 4Moderate mirror self-esteem
5 – 7Low mirror self-esteem
A score of 3 falls in the moderate range, suggesting a mixed or moderately confident sense of how others view the athlete’s abilities.
Competition ImportanceCI
Measures how important the upcoming competition feels to the athlete and how strongly they want to participate.
example score4/7
4/7Moderate importanceexample score
0 – 2Low importance
3 – 5Moderate importance
6 – 7High importance
A score of 4 indicates a moderate sense of competition importance and a moderate desire to take part.
Perception of OpponentsPoO
Measures how strongly the athlete rates opponents’ capabilities relative to their own readiness before the competition.
example score5/7
5/7Highly rates opponentsexample score
0 – 2Underestimates opponents
3 – 4Balanced view
5 – 7Highly rates opponents
A score of 5 indicates the athlete is inclined to view the opponents as highly capable and well-prepared compared with themselves.
Self-ConfidenceSC
Measures the athlete’s self-assessed confidence in achieving success in the upcoming competition (lower scores indicate higher readiness to compete).
example score3/7
3/7Moderate readinessexample score
0 – 2High readiness
3 – 5Moderate readiness
6 – 7Low readiness
A score of 3 falls in the Moderate readiness range, suggesting generally adequate self-confidence with some doubts that could affect pre-competition mindset.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Competitive athletes pre-event
46%OF USERS
Athletes take it in the days or hours before a key start to understand whether they feel anxious, challenged, confident, or unmotivated.
Coaches monitoring readiness
34%OF USERS
Coaches use it with individuals or teams to spot stress risks early and adjust preparation, communication, and pre-competition routines.
Sport psychologists and staff
20%OF USERS
Mental performance specialists administer it to identify dominant pre-competition attitudes and target support for fear of failure, apathy, or over-arousal.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Mirror Self-EsteemMS
You?
Average4.6
Typical rangeTypical3.6 – 5.5
Possible0 – 7
The Importance of CompetitionTIoC
You?
Average4.4
Typical rangeTypical3.2 – 5.5
Possible0 – 7
Perception of OpponentsPoO
You?
Average3.3
Typical rangeTypical2.3 – 4.4
Possible0 – 7
Self-ConfidenceS
You?
Average2.7
Typical rangeTypical1.6 – 3.8
Possible0 – 7
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Vividly imagine the upcoming competition and respond to each of the statements below. If you agree with a statement, answer “Yes”; if you disagree, answer “No.” Do not spend too much time thinking about the questions.
    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Attitude Toward the Upcoming Competition Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

sport

Athletes preparing for an important event can use the Attitude Toward the Upcoming Competition Scale Test to examine how they currently view the demands around competing. This competition readiness profile organizes reflection on the event’s significance, perceived evaluation, opponent comparison, and confidence. It helps an athlete identify aspects of the current competitive outlook that deserve attention before stepping into competition.

What This Assessment Explores

Statements cover motivation, physical and technical preparation, coach and teammate reactions, fear of disappointment, opponent familiarity, and ability beliefs. These situations form an assessment of competition readiness across four dimensions, not separate constructs.

The dimensions are:

  • Reflected Self-Esteem (0-7) measures perceived evaluation of ability: higher scores mean lower self-esteem; 0-2 High mirror self-esteem; 3-4 Moderate mirror self-esteem; 5-7 Low mirror self-esteem.
  • Competition Importance (0-7) measures desire and perceived importance: higher scores mean stronger desire to compete; 0-2 Low importance; 3-5 Moderate importance; 6-7 High importance.
  • Perception of Opponents (0-7) compares athlete’s abilities with competitors’ capabilities: higher scores mean higher appraisal of opponents’ readiness; 0-2 Underestimates opponents; 3-4 Balanced view; 5-7 Highly rates opponents.
  • Self-Confidence (0-7) reflects self-evaluation of success: higher scores indicate lower confidence, self-esteem, and desire to compete; 0-2 High readiness; 3-5 Moderate readiness; 6-7 Low readiness.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each first-person statement is answered Yes or No and refers to preparation, coach or teammate reactions, fear of failure, opponent familiarity, or desire to perform. Results are shown separately for the four dimensions; the answer-to-score mapping is unspecified, so no point value for Yes or No can be inferred from the displayed ranges. The format is a structured self-report method, and no norm-referenced scoring system is specified.

As a pre-competition questionnaire, the online version is conceptually consistent with Hanin’s published Attitude Toward Upcoming Competition Scale, but it is not an equivalent standardized edition of that instrument. Work by Lyashko on volleyball preparation and Hanin’s discussion of fear of failure provide only topic-specific background; they do not validate this digital version or establish every listed dimension.

Read the result as a profile of the athlete’s current perspective, which may shift after recent performance or changes in team relationships, physical condition, opponent knowledge, or event importance. Honest self-report and self-awareness affect the pattern. The bands are descriptive, and the profile alone cannot establish a diagnosis or predict competitive success.

Author: Albert Bandura
Literature:
  • Hanin, Yuri L. Psychology of Communication in Sport. Moscow: Fizkultura i Sport, 1980, 209 pp.
  • Lyashko, I. A. Features of Psychological Preparation of “Libero” in Volleyball in Corporate Sports of the Rosneft Concern. In Atomic Energy of Sport: Proceedings of an Educational and Methodological Seminar. Smolensk, 2023, pp. 82-85.
  • Hanin, Yuri L. Fear of Failure in the Context of Competitive Sport: A Commentary. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2008, 3(2), 185-188. 10.1260/174795408785100770
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment