Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
cyberpsychology

Cybervictimization Scale Test

Take the online Cybervictimization Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Cybervictimization Scale Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how often and how severely you face online harassment in about 7 minutes. This 38 item scale flags key risks fast to guide support and prevention.
Start Online Test
Questions: 387 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
20,785 views
2,387 completions
2,084 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
13/24
Prior Cybervictimization Experience (PCE)
Measures how frequently and intensely the person has experienced cybervictimization in the past.
Low
Moderate
High
813: Low | 1419: Moderate | 2024: High
A score of 13 falls in the Low range, suggesting relatively limited prior experiences of cybervictimization compared with higher scores on this scale.
example score
9/18
Digital Immersion (DI)
Digital Immersion measures how strongly a person is engaged in online communication and the broader digital environment.
Low immersion
Moderate immersion
High immersion
69: Low immersion | 1014: Moderate immersion | 1518: High immersion
A score of 9 indicates low digital immersion, suggesting relatively limited day-to-day involvement in online interactions compared with higher scorers.
example score
20/24
Protective Strategies (PS)
Measures how effectively a person uses self-protective behaviors to reduce negative outcomes in online interactions.
Low
Moderate
High
813: Low | 1418: Moderate | 1924: High
A score of 20 falls in the High range, indicating well-developed defensive strategies that generally help limit exposure and impact of cyber harassment.
example score
31/48
Provocative Behavior (PB)
Assesses how much a person’s online actions may create conditions that increase the likelihood of cybervictimization.
Low
Moderate
High
1626: Low | 2737: Moderate | 3848: High
A score of 31 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting some behaviors that could increase exposure to online harassment or fraud, though not at the highest level.
example score
54/114
Cybervictimization (C)
This scale measures how often and how severely a person experiences online harassment and other forms of cybervictimization.
Low vulnerability
Moderate vulnerability
High vulnerability
3863: Low vulnerability | 6488: Moderate vulnerability | 89114: High vulnerability
A score of 54 falls in the Low vulnerability range, suggesting relatively infrequent or less severe experiences of cybervictimization compared with higher scores.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Frequent social media users
41%OF USERS
People who spend a lot of time online and want to understand whether harassment, trolling, or unwanted contact is happening to them more than they realize.
Students facing online drama
33%OF USERS
Teens and young adults dealing with group chats, rumors, or cyberbullying who want a clearer picture of how often it occurs and how severe it feels.
Clients in counseling support
26%OF USERS
People already feeling stressed, anxious, or unsafe because of online conflicts who take the test to help guide next steps in coping and protection.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Experience of previous cybervictimization (Eopc)
Experience of previous cybervictimization (Eopc)
Average
18.1
Normal range
15.320.9
min.
8
max.
24
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Digital Immersion (DI)
Digital Immersion (DI)
Average
9.8
Normal range
811.7
min.
6
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Defensive Strategies (DS)
Defensive Strategies (DS)
Average
16.2
Normal range
14.218.2
min.
8
max.
24
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Provocative Behavior (PB)
Provocative Behavior (PB)
Average
37.7
Normal range
31.943.4
min.
16
max.
48
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Cybervictimization Scale (CS)
Cybervictimization Scale (CS)
Average
76.8
Normal range
63.490.1
min.
38
max.
114
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • I do not use antivirus software.
    • I install unlicensed or free versions.
    • I use only licensed versions.
    • This happens.
    • I visit them very rarely.
    • Never.
    • Yes, that is true.
    • Enough, but not a lot.
    • I try to minimize the time I spend online.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment

Cybervictimization Scale Test - Symptoms and Signs

cyberpsychology
victimhood

This measure is designed to assess self-reported experiences of online victimization and related distress. The Cybervictimization Scale provides a structured way to quantify the frequency and perceived impact of unwanted or harmful digital interactions in everyday internet use.

Developed by David P. Farrington, it includes 38 items and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete. Items sample a range of cybervictimization experiences (e.g., harassment, intimidation, deception, or other hostile online behaviors) and can be used to support clinical case formulation, monitor change over time, and inform risk management and intervention planning. When interpreting results, clinicians should consider contextual factors (platform norms, relationship dynamics, and co-occurring offline stressors) and integrate findings with collateral information as appropriate; the Cybervictimization Scale is not a standalone diagnostic tool.

Author: David P. Farrington
Literature: Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Corwin Press. 2009.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment