General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all true
- Hardly true
- Moderately true
- Exactly true
- Not at all true
- Hardly true
- Moderately true
- Exactly true
- Not at all true
- Hardly true
- Probably true
- Exactly true
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how they approach obstacles can use the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) Test to examine perceived coping capability in everyday situations. As a self-efficacy test, it is suited to readers reflecting on effort, persistence, problem solving, and confidence when circumstances become demanding. The result gives a focused profile of perceived personal agency rather than a judgment of character.
What This Assessment Explores
This measure examines whether you expect to find solutions, persist toward goals, and manage challenges through your own abilities. The general self-efficacy questionnaire covers coping confidence across many life situations, including everyday setbacks and unexpected events.
The questions cover these practical areas:
- Problem solving shows how readily you expect to generate solutions when difficulties arise.
- Goal pursuit reflects confidence that effort can overcome obstacles.
- Unexpected situations indicate how prepared you feel to act without certainty.
- Perceived control describes your belief that difficult circumstances can remain manageable.
The assessment uses one scale, General Self-Efficacy: 0-40, with Low 0-24, Moderate 25-35, and High 36-40. Higher coping confidence is linked to motivation, persistence, optimism, adjustment, and achievement; lower levels may accompany anxiety, depression, or low self-esteem. Success, observation, verbal persuasion, and emotional state shape it.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement asks you to rate how true it feels on four ordered response choices, from not at all or hardly true to exactly true. The items sample overcoming barriers, finding solutions, handling surprises, and keeping circumstances under control. The online version does not document how responses are converted into the displayed score, so the answer choices establish an ordered format without establishing point values or a summing rule.
The closest published reference is the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. The online questionnaire is a wording variant of that instrument, but its score remains separate from the instrument’s evidence and norms. Bandura’s self-efficacy theory links capability beliefs with effort, persistence, and reactions to difficulty. A cross-cultural study by Britta Scholz and colleagues examined general self-efficacy across cultures, supporting a broad construct without showing identical norms for every online version.
As a self-efficacy assessment, this is a structured self-report profile; its online presentation does not establish the published instrument’s reliability, norms, or validity evidence. Mood, recent successes or setbacks, and self-awareness can influence responses, making the result a snapshot of perceived capability.
- Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
- Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242-251. 10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. 10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
Updated: