Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never true
- Rarely true
- Sometimes true
- Often true
- Always true
- Always untrue
- Rarely true
- Sometimes true
- Mostly true
- Always true
- Never true
- Rarely true
- Sometimes true
- Usually true
- Always true
Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) Test - Description and methodology of the test
For children and adolescents who want to examine everyday attention and their relationship with difficult inner experiences, this questionnaire offers a focused self-report snapshot. The Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) Test is useful when a respondent wants to consider whether distraction, emotional avoidance, or dwelling on the past shapes present-moment awareness. It supports structured reflection on mindfulness in childhood and adolescence rather than a broad personality profile.
What This Assessment Explores
Mindfulness here means noticing present experience-thoughts, feelings, and actions-instead of moving automatically, avoiding inner events, or becoming absorbed in the past. The items examine attention, emotional acceptance, and judgment of unwanted experiences. Broader links with well-being or fewer difficulties describe the construct, not predictions about one person.
Three recurring areas explain what the result brings together:
- Present-moment attention shows how this mindfulness measure for children and adolescents captures noticing current activity instead of drifting through routines or replaying the past.
- Emotional openness reflects allowing feelings without labelling them as bad or pushing them away.
- Thought awareness captures recognizing upsetting or unexplained inner events without automatically escaping them.
The single result reflects Dispositional Mindfulness (0-40), and higher total scores indicate greater mindfulness. Low mindfulness: 0-13; Moderate mindfulness: 14-26; High mindfulness: 27-40.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses a five-point self-report response, ranging from never or always untrue to always true, with wording adapted to the statement. Negatively worded CAMM responses are scored in reverse before being combined into the displayed total, so higher totals indicate greater mindfulness. Since many statements describe avoidance, distraction, or discomfort, the result must be read through the scale definition rather than assuming that agreement with every difficulty means more mindfulness.
The source instrument is the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM), a one-factor measure developed for younger respondents. Its original validation study and later independent Dutch samples support the construct’s measurement, while a 2025 reliability generalization meta-analysis examines consistency across studies. The CAMM mindfulness test is conceptually consistent with that published measure, but an online presentation is not automatically identical to every research administration.
Interpretation is therefore best kept close to the displayed bands and the construct. Because this is a brief self-report result without a stated clinical norm for this online presentation, current context, self-awareness, and response style can affect the score, which should be considered alongside broader assessment rather than treated as a diagnosis.
- Greco, L. A., Baer, R. A., & Smith, G. T. (2011). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 606-614. 10.1037/a0022819
- de Bruin, E. I., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & Bögels, S. M. (2014). The meaning of mindfulness in children and adolescents: Further validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) in two independent samples from the Netherlands. Mindfulness, 5(4), 422-430. 10.1007/s12671-013-0196-8
- Doğan, R. Y., Demir, E., Öz, S., & Demircioğlu, H. (2025). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Psychological Reports, 128(6), 4760-4779. 10.1177/00332941231212844
Updated: