Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
addiction

Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS) Test

Take the online Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 26 questions and a completion time of about 5 minutes, the Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS) Test helps you examine withdrawal, tolerance, time management, and effects on daily life. Your result can highlight personal patterns and support focused self-reflection about how Internet use fits into your routines.
Questions: 265 minutes
Chen Internet Addiction Scale: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
17,905 views
1,278 completions
1,100 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,100 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Negative Consequences (RP)NC
Assesses the extent to which internet use is linked to intrapersonal difficulties and time-management problems that create negative life impact.
example score20/48
20/48Low impactexample score
12 – 23Low impact
24 – 35Moderate impact
36 – 48High impact
A score of 20 falls in the Low impact range, suggesting relatively limited negative consequences from internet use in terms of personal well-being and time management.
Composite Symptoms (IAS)CS
Integral symptoms (IAS) measures overall severity of key internet-addiction manifestations across compulsivity, withdrawal, and tolerance.
example score23/56
23/56Low symptomsexample score
14 – 27Low symptoms
28 – 41Moderate symptoms
42 – 56High symptoms
A score of 23 falls in the Low symptoms range, suggesting relatively mild overall expression of compulsive use, withdrawal reactions, and tolerance.
Time Management (TM)TM
Assesses how internet use affects planning and following a daily routine, including control over time spent online.
example score12/20
12/20Moderate impactexample score
5 – 9Low impact
10 – 14Moderate impact
15 – 20High impact
A score of 12 falls in the Moderate impact range, suggesting some difficulty keeping routines and limiting online time consistently.
Intrapersonal and Health-Related Problems (IH)IaHRP
Assesses how internet use is associated with intrapersonal difficulties and impacts psychological and physical well-being.
example score19/28
19/28Moderate impactexample score
7 – 13Low impact
14 – 20Moderate impact
21 – 28High impact
A score of 19 falls in the Moderate impact range, suggesting noticeable intrapersonal or health-related strain associated with internet use without being in the highest range.
Tolerance (TOL)T
Measures the extent to which a person needs increasing amounts of time online to achieve the same level of satisfaction.
example score9/16
9/16Moderate toleranceexample score
4 – 7Low tolerance
8 – 11Moderate tolerance
12 – 16High tolerance
A score of 9 falls in the Moderate tolerance range, suggesting some tendency to need more time online to feel similarly satisfied compared with earlier levels.
Withdrawal Symptoms (WIT)WS
Assesses the intensity of discomfort (e.g., irritability or anxiety) when internet access is limited or unavailable.
example score14/20
14/20Moderateexample score
5 – 9Low
10 – 14Moderate
15 – 20High
A score of 14 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting noticeable withdrawal-related discomfort when unable to use the internet.
Compulsive Symptoms (COM)CS
Measures the extent to which a person feels compelled to stay online and has difficulty controlling the urge to remain connected.
example score12/20
12/20Moderateexample score
5 – 9Low
10 – 14Moderate
15 – 20High
A score of 12 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable tendency toward compulsive internet use that may sometimes be hard to regulate.
Internet Addiction ScaleIAS
Measures the severity of internet addictive behavior by capturing core symptoms (tolerance, withdrawal, compulsivity) and related negative consequences.
example score74/104
74/104Highexample score
26 – 42Low
43 – 64Moderate
65 – 104High
A score of 74 falls in the High range, suggesting a pronounced tendency toward problematic internet use with stronger symptoms and impacts.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Heavy daily internet users
41%OF USERS
People who spend many hours online and worry it’s starting to affect their sleep, mood, or productivity.
Teens and young adults
34%OF USERS
Students and young people whose school, relationships, or routines are slipping because they can’t easily disconnect.
Parents and counselors
25%OF USERS
Adults who want a quick, structured check of online behavior patterns to identify risk and track changes over time.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Negative consequences (RP)
You?
Average27.3
Typical rangeTypical20.7 – 33.9
Possible12 – 48
Integral symptoms (IAS)
You?
Average32.4
Typical rangeTypical25 – 39.8
Possible14 – 56
Time Management (TM)
You?
Average10.5
Typical rangeTypical8.2 – 12.8
Possible5 – 20
Issues (IH)
You?
Average16.4
Typical rangeTypical13.6 – 19.3
Possible7 – 28
Tolerance (TOL)
You?
Average12.3
Typical rangeTypical10 – 14.5
Possible4 – 16
Withdrawal Symptoms (WIT)
You?
Average16
Typical rangeTypical14 – 18
Possible5 – 20
Compulsive Symptoms (COM)
You?
Average14.7
Typical rangeTypical12.4 – 16.9
Possible5 – 20
Internet Addiction ScaleIAS
You?
Average50.1
Typical rangeTypical37.7 – 62.5
Possible26 – 104
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Below is a list of activities or descriptions of Internet-related situations that may apply to individuals with experience using the Internet. Please read each item carefully and select the response that most accurately reflects your Internet use over the past 6 months.
    • Not at all applicable
    • Slightly applicable
    • Partially applicable
    • Completely applicable
    • Not at all true
    • Slightly true
    • Somewhat true
    • Completely true
    • Does not apply at all
    • Slightly applies
    • Somewhat applies
    • Completely applies
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS) Test - Description and methodology of the test

addiction
cyberpsychology
computer addiction

People who wonder whether online activity is becoming difficult to control can use this internet addiction assessment to organise that concern around recognizable patterns. The Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS) Test helps respondents understand what their result says about areas that may deserve closer attention in everyday life. It provides a structured starting point for reflection without reducing a complex routine to one impression.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire is intended for people reflecting on whether internet use is affecting control, wellbeing, or routine. It covers urges and failed attempts to cut back, discomfort when access is limited, increasing time online, and the sense that online activity has become central to daily life. It also asks about sleep, eating, physical discomfort, relationships, relaxation, school, and work. Together, these items connect core internet addiction symptoms with the consequences that make a pattern disruptive. The result describes compulsive, withdrawal, and tolerance symptoms, time-management difficulties, intrapersonal and health-related effects, negative consequences, and the overall profile. Reading the result alongside recent habits helps keep the score tied to lived context rather than a label alone.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Four choices rate each statement; scores produce subscales and totals:

  • Negative Consequences (12-48) measures intrapersonal/time-management impact: Low impact 12-23, Moderate impact 24-35, High impact 36-48; Time Management (5-20) measures schedule control: Low impact 5-9, Moderate impact 10-14, High impact 15-20.
  • Intrapersonal and Health-Related Problems (7-28) measures wellbeing: Low impact 7-13, Moderate impact 14-20, High impact 21-28.
  • Composite Symptoms (14-56) measures core symptoms: Low symptoms 14-27, Moderate symptoms 28-41, High symptoms 42-56.
  • Tolerance (4-16) measures increasing time online: Low tolerance 4-7, Moderate tolerance 8-11, High tolerance 12-16; Withdrawal Symptoms (5-20) measures offline discomfort: Low 5-9, Moderate 10-14, High 15-20.
  • Compulsive Symptoms (5-20) measures online compulsion: Low 5-9, Moderate 10-14, High 15-20; Internet Addiction Scale (26-104) measures overall severity: Low 26-42, Moderate 43-64, High 65-104.

Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS) is the source instrument; this questionnaire is conceptually consistent, not an adaptation. Cut-offs and revisions contextualize interpretation but do not validate this version; self-report varies with context and response style.

Author: Kimberly S. Young
Literature:
  • Chen, Sue-Huei, Li-Jen Weng, Yi-Jen Su, Ho-Mao Wu, and Pin-Feng Yang. (2003). Development of a Chinese Internet Addiction Scale and Its Psychometric Study. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 279-294. 10.6129/CJP.2003.4503.05
  • Ko, Chih-Hung, Cheng-Fang Yen, Chia-Nan Yen, Ju-Yu Yen, Cheng-Chung Chen, and Sue-Huei Chen. (2005). Screening for Internet Addiction: An Empirical Study on Cut-off Points for the Chen Internet Addiction Scale. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 21(12), 545-551. 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70206-2
  • Mak, Kwok-Kei, Ching-Man Lai, Chih-Hung Ko, Chien Chou, Dong-Il Kim, Hiroko Watanabe, and Roger C. M. Ho. (2014). Psychometric Properties of the Revised Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS-R) in Chinese Adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(7), 1237-1245. 10.1007/s10802-014-9851-3
  • Young, Kimberly S. (1998). Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237-244. 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment