Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
psychopathology

Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) Test

Take the online Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In about five minutes, the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) Test invites you to answer 24 statements about self-understanding, emotional regulation, goals, empathy, trust, and relationships. Your profile can highlight patterns in personality functioning and interpersonal life, supporting focused self-reflection and a clearer view of your strengths and difficulties.
Questions: 245 minutes
Self and Interpersonal Functioning: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
23,149 views
2,339 completions
1,938 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,938 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Need for Trusting RelationshipsNfTR
Measures how strongly a person seeks and sustains trusting, close relationships characterized by intimacy and mutual respect.
example score1/4
1/4Low need for trustexample score
0 – 1.3Low need for trust
1.4 – 2.5Moderate need for trust
2.6 – 4High need for trust
A score of 1 falls in the low range, suggesting a relatively limited desire or comfort for forming deep, enduring trusting bonds.
EmpathyE
Empathy measures how well a person understands and respects others’ feelings and motives and considers the impact of their behavior on others.
example score1/4
1/4Lowexample score
0 – 1.3Low
1.3 – 2.5Moderate
2.5 – 4High
A score of 1 falls in the Low range, suggesting reduced sensitivity to others’ perspectives and less consistent consideration of how one’s actions affect people around them.
Self-DirectionSD
Measures the ability to set and pursue meaningful goals, follow internal standards, and reflect productively on one’s behavior.
example score2/4
2/4Moderate self-directionexample score
0 – 1.9Low self-direction
1.9 – 2.5Moderate self-direction
2.5 – 4High self-direction
A score of 2 indicates moderate self-direction, suggesting some capacity to set goals and self-regulate, with occasional difficulties maintaining consistent direction or follow-through.
Self-AwarenessSA
Self-awareness reflects how well a person recognizes their emotions and motives, maintains stable self-esteem, and regulates emotional experiences.
example score2/4
2/4Moderateexample score
0 – 1.9Low
1.9 – 2.5Moderate
2.5 – 4High
A score of 2 indicates a moderate level of self-awareness, suggesting some stability in self-understanding and emotion regulation with occasional difficulties.
Severity IndexSI
The Severity Index summarizes the overall level of difficulties in personality and interpersonal functioning.
example score2/4
2/4Moderateexample score
0 – 1.9Mild
1.9 – 2.5Moderate
2.5 – 4High
A score of 2 indicates a moderate level of overall personality functioning difficulties on this scale.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People in rocky relationships
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand patterns behind recurring conflicts, trust issues, or difficulties with closeness and support.
Clients starting therapy
34%OF USERS
They use it to quickly map strengths and problem areas in self-understanding, goals, and empathy before deeper work.
Clinicians doing quick screening
25%OF USERS
They administer it to estimate the severity of personality functioning issues and choose what to focus on in treatment planning.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Need for trust in relationshipsNftir
You?
Average2.3
Typical rangeTypical1.5 – 3
Possible0 – 4
EmpathyE
You?
Average1.4
Typical rangeTypical1 – 1.9
Possible0 – 4
Self-DirectionS
You?
Average2.2
Typical rangeTypical1.7 – 2.8
Possible0 – 4
Self-awarenessS
You?
Average1.9
Typical rangeTypical1.3 – 2.5
Possible0 – 4
Severity IndexSI
You?
Average2.3
Typical rangeTypical1.7 – 2.9
Possible0 – 4
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

This questionnaire consists of 24 statements about you and your relationships with other people. Please rate how closely each statement describes you. Respond spontaneously, based on your own impression. There are no right or wrong answers; the goal is to understand how you see yourself.
    • The statement does not describe me at all
    • The statement barely describes me
    • The statement moderately describes me
    • The statement largely describes me
    • The statement completely describes me
    • The statement does not describe me at all
    • The statement barely describes me
    • The statement moderately describes me
    • The statement largely describes me
    • The statement completely describes me
    • The statement does not describe me at all
    • The statement barely describes me
    • The statement moderately describes me
    • The statement largely describes me
    • The statement completely describes me
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) Test - Description and methodology of the test

psychopathology
personality disorder

People who want a structured view of how they experience themselves and relate to others may use the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) Test to examine patterns in identity, emotions, goals, and relationships. It focuses on personality functioning in emotional, goal-directed, and relational experiences. A self and interpersonal functioning questionnaire can help readers notice areas that feel secure, inconsistent, or difficult, while keeping the result descriptive rather than diagnostic.

What This Assessment Explores

A personality functioning test covers identity, emotions, goals, empathy, trust, and closeness. The dimensions are:

  • Need for Trusting Relationships (0-4) measures depth, stability, intimacy, mutual respect; Low need for trust 0-1.3; Moderate need for trust 1.4-2.5; High need for trust 2.6-4.
  • Empathy (0-4) assesses understanding and respect for others’ feelings, motivations, and one’s impact; Low 0-1.3; Moderate 1.3-2.5; High 2.5-4.
  • Self-Direction (0-4) measures goals, standards, and reflection; Low self-direction 0-1.9; Moderate self-direction 1.9-2.5; High self-direction 2.5-4.
  • Self-Awareness (0-4) measures individuality, self-esteem, and regulation; Low 0-1.9; Moderate 1.9-2.5; High 2.5-4.
  • Severity Index (0-4) reflects dysfunction severity; higher indicates greater impairment; lower, less; Mild 0-1.9; Moderate 1.9-2.5; High 2.5-4.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item is a first-person statement rated from 1 (does not describe me at all) to 5 (completely describes me). The content covers patterns in emotions, identity, values, goals, empathy, disagreement, closeness, trust, and relationship stability.

The questionnaire reports scores through bands. It does not specify item-by-item point contributions, a reverse-scoring procedure, or the conversion from 1-5 responses to 0-4 scores, so readers should interpret the profile as a pattern of tendencies rather than reconstructing a scoring formula.

Its conceptual anchor is SIFS (Gamache et al., 2019), a self-report measure developed for DSM-5 personality functioning. Gamache et al. (2021) examined links between SIFS scores and ICD-11 severity degrees, while Macina et al. (2024) evaluated a German version’s psychometric properties. This online version is conceptually consistent with that work, not presented as a direct adaptation or normed replication.

As an interpersonal functioning assessment, it supports self-reflection, while responses can shift with context, self-awareness, and response bias. The result is a snapshot: the bands describe the displayed level of each dimension, but they cannot establish its cause, duration, or impact across every setting.

Author: Aaron T. Beck, Theodore Millon
Literature:
  • Gamache, D., Savard, C., Leclerc, P., & Côté, A. (2019). Introducing a short self-report for the assessment of DSM-5 level of personality functioning for personality disorders: The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(5), 438-447. 10.1037/per0000335
  • Gamache, D., Savard, C., Leclerc, P., Payant, M., Berthelot, N., Côté, A., Faucher, J., Lampron, M., Lemieux, R., Mayrand, K., Nolin, M.-C., & Tremblay, M. (2021). A Proposed Classification of ICD-11 Severity Degrees of Personality Pathology Using the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 628057. 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.628057
  • Macina, C., Kerber, A., Zimmermann, J., Ohse, L., Kampe, L., Mohr, J., Walter, M., Hörz-Sagstetter, S., & Wrege, J. S. (2024). Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the German Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS). Journal of Personality Assessment, 106(6), 711-723. 10.1080/00223891.2023.2268199

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment