Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBC) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBC) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who notice frequent appearance checking, concern about meeting body ideals, or strong beliefs about changing weight may use the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBC) Test to examine these patterns more closely. It is suited to self-reflection about how the body is experienced and judged. As a body image self-assessment, it organizes these themes into a more focused understanding of your result.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire examines how a person relates to the body as observed, evaluated, and managed. Items address appearance comparison, monitoring, comfort versus looks, shame when standards are missed, and beliefs about whether shape or weight reflects effort, genes, or fixed traits. This body image questionnaire suits self-reflection without requiring age or clinical status.
Four scales show result bands:
- Control (8-56) measures perceived responsibility for appearance and weight: Lower control belief (8-23), Moderate control belief (24-40), Higher control belief (41-56).
- Body Shame (0-0) measures internalized standards and shame: No shame indicated (0-0), Not scorable range (0-0).
- Body Surveillance (0-0) measures observer-focused monitoring: Minimal observation (0-0), Elevated observation (0-0).
- Objectified Body Consciousness (24-168) measures observer-focused body evaluation, internalized social and cultural appearance standards, and beliefs about control over the body: Lower objectified awareness (24-71), Moderate objectified awareness (72-119), Higher objectified awareness (120-168).
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses a seven-point agreement format from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with a neutral midpoint. The questionnaire displays separate dimensions and an overall result from self-reported responses, but its online scoring has not been standardized; do not infer another point system from the displayed ranges.
The principal reference is the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBCS; McKinley & Hyde, 1996), a published instrument addressing body surveillance, body shame, and control beliefs. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument, but the online format should not be assumed to reproduce every administration or validation procedure. As a self-objectification test, it offers reflection on observer-focused body evaluation.
The questionnaire is also conceptually consistent with Objectification Theory, which describes how observer-focused evaluation can make appearance monitoring routine. Moradi and Varnes (2017) later reevaluated the source scale’s structure, so interpretation can vary across samples and versions.
Published research supports the source framework, not automatic norms for this format. Mood, cultural standards, memory, and social desirability can influence answers; the profile cannot establish a clinical condition or explain its causes without broader context.
- McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and Validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 181-215. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
- Moradi, B., & Varnes, J. R. (2017). Structure of the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Reevaluated 20 Years Later. Sex Roles, 77(5-6), 325-337. 10.1007/s11199-016-0731-x
- Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women’s Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Updated: