Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
hostility

Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS) Test

Take the online Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In five minutes, 27 questions on the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS) Test can help you explore patterns in tension, irritability, distrust, and views of other people. Your profile separates three emotional and interpersonal dimensions, offering a concise starting point for self-reflection about emotional reactions and relationships.
Questions: 275 minutes
Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS): situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
29,833 views
1,815 completions
1,516 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,516 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

HostilityH
Measures the degree of internal tension and hostile attitudes such as cynicism, negativism, and vigilance toward others.
example score12/30
12/30Averageexample score
6 – 10Low
11 – 17Average
18 – 30High
A score of 12 falls in the Average range, suggesting generally balanced emotional tone with occasional negative or wary reactions toward others.
AggressivenessA
Assesses the tendency to express aggression in behavior and interpersonal interactions, including irritability and conflict-proneness.
example score38/54
38/54Highexample score
9 – 15Low
16 – 29Moderate
30 – 54High
A score of 38 falls in the High range, suggesting a more pronounced tendency toward irritability and conflict in interpersonal situations.
CynicismC
Measures the degree of distrustful, suspicious, and negatively biased expectations about other people’s intentions.
example score51/78
51/78Moderate cynicismexample score
13 – 39Low cynicism
40 – 65Moderate cynicism
66 – 78High cynicism
A score of 51 falls in the moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not pervasive tendency toward skepticism and cautious expectations in social interactions.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People in relationship strain
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand whether cynicism, distrust, or irritability is fueling recurring conflicts with partners, friends, or family.
Therapy and clinic clients
34%OF USERS
They use it in psychological assessment to quickly flag hostile attitudes that may intensify stress, anxiety, or interpersonal problems.
HR and high-stakes teams
25%OF USERS
They take it during screening or development to identify potential conflict risks and improve communication in demanding workplaces.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Hostility ScaleHS
You?
Average22.9
Typical rangeTypical18.6 – 27.2
Possible6 – 30
Aggressiveness ScaleAS
You?
Average21.6
Typical rangeTypical14.8 – 28.5
Possible9 – 54
Cynicism ScaleCS
You?
Average34.5
Typical rangeTypical25.3 – 43.7
Possible13 – 78
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Please read the statements in this questionnaire carefully. If you consider a statement to be true and consistent with your view of yourself and other people, indicate the extent to which you agree with it using the response scale provided.
    • Usually
    • Often
    • Sometimes
    • Occasionally
    • Rarely
    • Never
    • Usually
    • Often
    • Sometimes
    • By chance
    • Rarely
    • Never
    • Usually
    • Often
    • Sometimes
    • By chance
    • Rarely
    • Never
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS) Test - Description and methodology of the test

hostility

People who want to examine recurring irritability, mistrust, and antagonistic reactions may find the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (CMHS) Test useful for organizing reactions to conflict, trust, and interpersonal friction. The resulting hostility profile helps readers consider how they interpret other people’s motives, respond to friction, and manage resentment. Results describe tendencies rather than fixed character traits, helping the reader consider patterns that may change with context.

What This Assessment Explores

The items focus on tension, provocation, judgments about others’ motives, and reactions when boundaries or principles feel challenged. They suit self-reflection about relationships and conflict, with results describing recurring attitudes rather than labeling the whole personality.

The profile separates these dimensions:

  • Hostility (6-30) is intended to measure internal tension, negative affect, and unfriendliness; Low 6-10, Average 11-17, and High 18-30 are the displayed bands.
  • Aggressiveness (9-54) is intended to measure aggression in behavior and relationships; Low 9-15, Moderate 16-29, and High 30-54 are the displayed bands.
  • Cynicism (13-78) is intended to measure distrust, suspiciousness, and negative perceptions of others; Low cynicism 13-39, Moderate cynicism 40-65, and High cynicism 66-78 are the displayed bands.

Reading your hostility test results alongside recent situations can clarify familiar reactions. A higher band may indicate a stronger tendency, not every interaction.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement is answered with one of six frequency choices that generally run from Usually or Often to Rarely or Never; middle labels vary between items. The items cover opinions, interpersonal expectations, irritation, retaliation, and moral judgments. The questionnaire reports three displayed scores and places each within its stated range and band; the range alone does not reveal how any answer contributes.

The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale provides a published comparison for hostile attitudes and is an MMPI-derived measure. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with it, but it is not a documented adaptation or equivalent form of that instrument. Research on the published scale’s item content and multidimensionality provides context for these themes, but findings from those samples do not validate this questionnaire or its displayed bands.

For Cook-Medley scale interpretation, consider mood, recent conflict, defensiveness, social desirability, and limited self-awareness when reviewing the profile. The displayed bands are result categories for this questionnaire, not established normative or clinical thresholds; honest self-report and current context can affect the picture.

Author: D. M. Medley, W. W. Cook
Literature:
  • Cook, W. W., & Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and Pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38(6), 414-418. 10.1037/h0060667
  • Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Williams, R. B. (1989). The Cook-Medley hostility scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51(1), 46-57. 10.1097/00006842-198901000-00005
  • Olson, M. B., Krantz, D. S., Kelsey, S. F., Pepine, C. J., Sopko, G., Handberg, E., Rogers, W. J., Gierach, G. L., McClure, C. K., & Bairey Merz, C. N. (2005). Hostility scores are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events in women undergoing coronary angiography: A report from the NHLBI-Sponsored WISE Study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(4), 546-552. 10.1097/01.psy.0000170830.99263.4e
  • Contrada, R. J., & Jussim, L. (1992). What does the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale measure? In search of an adequate measurement model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(8), 615-627. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00993.x

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment