Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
alexithymia

Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) Test

Take the online Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 26 questions and about 25 minutes to complete, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) Test presents the original 26-item TAS content, exploring how you identify and describe feelings, notice bodily sensations, and approach emotional understanding for focused self-reflection.
Questions: 2625 minutes
Toronto Alexithymia: cards against her chest
June 11, 2025June 11, 2025Material has been updatedJune 11, 2025Material has been published
29,217 views
4,404 completions
2,004 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,004 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Total AlexithymiaTA
This scale measures overall alexithymia, reflecting difficulty identifying and describing emotions and a tendency toward externally oriented thinking.
example score53/130
53/130Lowexample score
26 – 60Low
61 – 95Moderate
96 – 130High
A score of 53 falls in the Low range, suggesting relatively fewer self-reported difficulties with recognizing and describing emotions and less externally focused thinking compared with higher scores.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People in talk therapy
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand why it’s hard to name feelings and to guide what to focus on in therapy.
Mental health researchers
34%OF USERS
They use it in studies to measure emotional awareness and compare it across groups or over time.
Partners and family members
25%OF USERS
They take it when relationships feel emotionally distant and they want clarity about difficulties expressing emotions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
General AlexithymiaGA
You?
Average59.8
Typical rangeTypical41.7 – 77.9
Possible26 – 130
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) Test - Description and methodology of the test

alexithymia

People considering whether to explore their emotional processing style, discuss recurring communication difficulties, or prepare questions for a fuller conversation may choose the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) Test. An alexithymia questionnaire can provide a common frame for deciding which experiences deserve closer reflection. The result supports that conversation without reducing a complex personal history to one label.

What This Assessment Explores

These items explore how a person notices, labels, explains, and communicates inner experience. They cover uncertainty about whether a feeling is sadness, fear, or anger, difficulty finding words, confusing bodily sensations, daydreaming, and a preference for practical or causal explanations. In practical terms, this alexithymia assessment describes an emotional-processing style rather than one isolated reaction. Its themes are:

  • Total Alexithymia (26-130) assesses overall alexithymia, reflecting difficulty identifying and describing emotions and an externally oriented thinking style; the displayed bands are Low 26-60, Moderate 61-95, and High 96-130.
  • Emotional awareness shows how clearly the respondent can recognize and distinguish feelings.
  • Externally oriented thinking reflects whether attention tends to remain with events, solutions, and explanations rather than emotional experience.

The result brings these themes together into one descriptive level, helping a reader notice patterns that may merit closer personal reflection.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement uses a five-point agreement format, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. Items cover emotional clarity, bodily sensations, imagination, and explanatory style, so the result reflects patterns across related situations rather than one answer. The questionnaire reports one displayed total, but the answer labels do not specify how much each option contributes.

The 26 statements correspond to the original 26-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), not the later 20-item TAS-20 revision. Its 1985 study introduced self-report measurement of alexithymia; later work examined personality, psychopathology, and criterion validity. The online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that research, but is not presented as an adaptation of them.

In this questionnaire, the displayed categories are descriptive levels for an alexithymia self-assessment, while the online form's scoring is not presented as standardized for this digital version. Findings on the original TAS describe the construct but do not establish this form's performance. Responses may shift with current stress, self-awareness, and willingness to describe private experiences, so the score is best read as a starting point for reflection rather than a complete account of emotional functioning.

Author: Bagby, R.M., Ryan, D.P., Taylor, G.J.
Literature:
  • Taylor, G. J., Ryan, D., & Bagby, R. M. (1985). Toward the Development of a New Self-Report Alexithymia Scale. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 44(4), 191-199. 10.1159/000287912
  • Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., & Ryan, D. (1986). Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Relationship with Personality and Psychopathology Measures. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 45(4), 207-215. 10.1159/000287950
  • Taylor, G. J., Bagby, R. M., Ryan, D. P., Parker, J. D. A., Doody, K. F., & Keefe, P. (1988). Criterion Validity of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50(5), 500-509. 10.1097/00006842-198809000-00006

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment