Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering whether to explore their emotional processing style, discuss recurring communication difficulties, or prepare questions for a fuller conversation may choose the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) Test. An alexithymia questionnaire can provide a common frame for deciding which experiences deserve closer reflection. The result supports that conversation without reducing a complex personal history to one label.
What This Assessment Explores
These items explore how a person notices, labels, explains, and communicates inner experience. They cover uncertainty about whether a feeling is sadness, fear, or anger, difficulty finding words, confusing bodily sensations, daydreaming, and a preference for practical or causal explanations. In practical terms, this alexithymia assessment describes an emotional-processing style rather than one isolated reaction. Its themes are:
- Total Alexithymia (26-130) assesses overall alexithymia, reflecting difficulty identifying and describing emotions and an externally oriented thinking style; the displayed bands are Low 26-60, Moderate 61-95, and High 96-130.
- Emotional awareness shows how clearly the respondent can recognize and distinguish feelings.
- Externally oriented thinking reflects whether attention tends to remain with events, solutions, and explanations rather than emotional experience.
The result brings these themes together into one descriptive level, helping a reader notice patterns that may merit closer personal reflection.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses a five-point agreement format, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. Items cover emotional clarity, bodily sensations, imagination, and explanatory style, so the result reflects patterns across related situations rather than one answer. The questionnaire reports one displayed total, but the answer labels do not specify how much each option contributes.
The 26 statements correspond to the original 26-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), not the later 20-item TAS-20 revision. Its 1985 study introduced self-report measurement of alexithymia; later work examined personality, psychopathology, and criterion validity. The online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that research, but is not presented as an adaptation of them.
In this questionnaire, the displayed categories are descriptive levels for an alexithymia self-assessment, while the online form's scoring is not presented as standardized for this digital version. Findings on the original TAS describe the construct but do not establish this form's performance. Responses may shift with current stress, self-awareness, and willingness to describe private experiences, so the score is best read as a starting point for reflection rather than a complete account of emotional functioning.
- Taylor, G. J., Ryan, D., & Bagby, R. M. (1985). Toward the Development of a New Self-Report Alexithymia Scale. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 44(4), 191-199. 10.1159/000287912
- Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., & Ryan, D. (1986). Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Relationship with Personality and Psychopathology Measures. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 45(4), 207-215. 10.1159/000287950
- Taylor, G. J., Bagby, R. M., Ryan, D. P., Parker, J. D. A., Doody, K. F., & Keefe, P. (1988). Criterion Validity of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50(5), 500-509. 10.1097/00006842-198809000-00006
Updated: