Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
sport

Perception of Success Questionnaire (POSQ) Test

Take the online Perception of Success Questionnaire (POSQ) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Perception of Success Questionnaire (POSQ) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In about three minutes, the Perception of Success Questionnaire (POSQ) Test presents 12 questions about personal improvement and comparison with others. Your result can support self-reflection on how you approach achievement, persistence, and goal pursuit in sport.
Questions: 123 minutes
Perception of Success Questionnaire: test ticket with numbers
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
23,469 views
1,701 completion
1,472 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,472 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Task OrientationTO
Task Orientation measures the extent to which an athlete defines success through skill development, effort, and progress toward personal goals.
example score16/30
16/30Moderate task focusexample score
6 – 13Lower task focus
14 – 22Moderate task focus
23 – 30Higher task focus
A score of 16 indicates a moderate task focus, suggesting a fairly consistent emphasis on improving skills and meeting personal goals, with room to strengthen persistence and process-based motivation.
Ego OrientationEO
This scale measures how strongly an athlete defines success through self-affirmation and outperforming others via interpersonal comparisons.
example score18/30
18/30Moderate comparison focusexample score
6 – 13Low comparison focus
14 – 22Moderate comparison focus
23 – 30High comparison focus
A score of 18 indicates a moderate tendency to judge success by doing better than others rather than primarily by personal improvement.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Competitive athletes in-season
44%OF USERS
Athletes take it to see whether their motivation comes more from personal improvement or from winning and outperforming others.
Coaches shaping team mindset
33%OF USERS
Coaches use it to understand what drives each athlete and to tailor feedback, goals, and training focus after wins and losses.
Sport psychologists and counselors
23%OF USERS
Practitioners administer it to quickly assess an athlete’s success orientation and guide motivation and resilience work.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Task OrientationTO
You?
Average12.5
Typical rangeTypical9.1 – 15.9
Possible6 – 30
Focus on YourselfFoY
You?
Average22.4
Typical rangeTypical18 – 26.7
Possible6 – 30
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Neutral
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Neutral
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Neutral
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Perception of Success Questionnaire (POSQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test

sport

Athletes, coaches, and anyone reflecting on competitive habits can use this assessment to examine what success means in practice: personal progress, persistence, and goal attainment, or proving superiority through comparison. The Perception of Success Questionnaire (POSQ) Test turns those tendencies into a structured profile. It can help you notice which achievement cues influence your effort and reactions, clarifying your achievement goals in sport.

What This Assessment Measures

At its core, the test distinguishes two achievement perspectives. One emphasizes personal competence, persistence, goal pursuit, and controllable, less stressful training; the other emphasizes status, winning, and superiority through comparison. Questions fit anyone examining training, competition, effort, and reactions to success or failure. Both orientations can coexist and vary by situation, giving you a clearer sense of your achievement orientation.

The result has two scales:

  • Task Orientation (6-30) reflects personal competence and set-goal striving; higher scores tend to accompany persistence, goal pursuit, and more controllable, less stressful training. Lower task focus: 6-13; Moderate task focus: 14-22; Higher task focus: 23-30.
  • Ego Orientation (6-30) reflects self-affirmation and superiority through comparison; higher scores may accompany greater stress and a higher likelihood of discontinuing sport after failure. Low comparison focus: 6-13; Moderate comparison focus: 14-22; High comparison focus: 23-30.

Together, the scores show whether success is framed through mastery, comparison, or both.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item is written in the first person and answered on a five-point scale from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with a neutral midpoint. The 12 responses form two six-item groups; responses scored from 1 to 5 are combined within each group, producing a profile rather than one overall score.

Achievement judgments connect with sport motivation in competition: statements cover winning and outperforming others alongside hard work, difficulty, improvement, and goal attainment.

The published Perception of Success Questionnaire (POSQ), associated with Roberts, Treasure, and Balagué, is the closest source for the task-versus-ego distinction. The achievement-goal framework associated with Duda and Nicholls links competence-focused striving with comparison-focused success judgments. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that published work, but it is not the same validated instrument.

The online questionnaire uses descriptive bands rather than population norms and is not presented as a standardized or normed instrument. Because results rely on self-report, they can shift with response style, current context, and self-awareness, so the profile should guide reflection rather than serve as a diagnosis or prediction of future persistence or withdrawal.

Author: Joan L. Duda, John G. Nicholls
Literature:
  • Roberts, G. C., Treasure, D. C., & Balague, G. (1998). Achievement goals in sport: The development and validation of the Perception of Success Questionnaire. Journal of Sports Sciences, 16(4), 337-347. 10.1080/02640419808559362
  • Treasure, D. C., & Roberts, G. C. (1994). Perception of Success Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation in an Adolescent Population. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1), 607-610. 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.607
  • Duda, Joan L., & Nicholls, John G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 290-299. 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.290

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment