Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
eating behavior

Dysfunctional Eating Attitudes Scale (DEAS) Test

Take the online Dysfunctional Eating Attitudes Scale (DEAS) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Dysfunctional Eating Attitudes Scale (DEAS) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 37 questions and an estimated completion time of 7 minutes, the Dysfunctional Eating Attitudes Scale (DEAS) Test explores thoughts, feelings, and habits related to food, appetite, weight, and eating. Your result can support personal reflection by highlighting areas of balance, concern, rigidity, or difficulty in your relationship with food.
Questions: 377 minutes
Dysfunctional Eating Attitudes Scale: situation and reply bubbles
September 1, 2026September 1, 2026Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
34,320 views
3,017 completions
2,623 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,623 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Beliefs About Normal EatingBANE
Assesses beliefs about what counts as normal or healthy eating and how rigid or flexible those standards are.
example score43/70
43/70Mixed/rigid tendenciesexample score
14 – 32Balanced views
33 – 51Mixed/rigid tendencies
52 – 70Highly rigid beliefs
A score of 43 falls in the Mixed/rigid tendencies range, suggesting some less flexible beliefs about normal nutrition that may influence eating-related thoughts and choices.
Food CravingFC
Measures the intensity of craving for food and how strongly urges to eat may challenge appetite control.
example score11/15
11/15Moderateexample score
3 – 6Low
7 – 11Moderate
12 – 15High
A score of 11 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable level of food craving that may sometimes make appetite control more difficult.
Restrictive and Compensatory PracticesRaCP
Measures the tendency to use restrictive or compensatory eating strategies (e.g., dieting or weight-control behaviors).
example score12/20
12/20Moderateexample score
4 – 9Low
10 – 14Moderate
15 – 20High
A score of 12 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme tendency toward restrictive or compensatory eating practices.
Concerns About Eating and Weight GainCAEaWG
Measures anxiety and concern about eating and the possibility of weight gain.
example score12/20
12/20Moderate concernexample score
4 – 9Low concern
10 – 14Moderate concern
15 – 20High concern
A score of 12 suggests a moderate level of worry about food and potential weight gain compared with the scale range.
Relationship With FoodRWF
Measures emotional and behavioral attitudes toward eating, including the degree of maladaptive patterns in one’s relationship with food.
example score38/60
38/60Some difficultiesexample score
12 – 27More balanced
28 – 43Some difficulties
44 – 60Marked difficulties
A score of 38 falls in the 'Some difficulties' range, suggesting noticeable but not extreme emotional or behavioral tensions around eating.
Dysfunctional Eating BeliefsDEB
Measures the degree to which a person holds maladaptive or distorted beliefs and attitudes about food and eating.
example score110/185
110/185Highexample score
37 – 49Low
50 – 72Moderate
73 – 185High
A score of 110 falls in the High range, suggesting a stronger presence of dysfunctional beliefs about food compared with lower scores on this scale.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People worried about eating
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand whether their thoughts, emotions, or behaviors around food may be becoming unhealthy or obsessive.
Clients in therapy or care
34%OF USERS
They use it as part of counseling or treatment to pinpoint specific beliefs and feelings that maintain problematic eating patterns.
Clinicians and researchers
25%OF USERS
They administer it to assess eating-related cognitions, support diagnosis, track change over time, or collect standardized study data.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Concepts of Normal NutritionCoNN
You?
Average48.8
Typical rangeTypical40.4 – 57.2
Possible14 – 70
Craving for foodCff
You?
Average10
Typical rangeTypical8.3 – 11.6
Possible3 – 15
Restrictive and compensatory practicesRacp
You?
Average13.5
Typical rangeTypical11.3 – 15.7
Possible4 – 20
Concerns about food and weight gainCafawg
You?
Average14.9
Typical rangeTypical12.4 – 17.4
Possible4 – 20
Relationship with FoodRwF
You?
Average47.9
Typical rangeTypical40.1 – 55.7
Possible12 – 60
Scale of Dysfunctional Beliefs About FoodSoDBAF
You?
Average136.7
Typical rangeTypical115.6 – 157.8
Possible37 – 185
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • This product is healthy and necessary
    • Sometimes consuming this product is healthy and necessary
    • Avoiding this product is healthy and necessary
    • This product is healthy and necessary
    • Sometimes consuming this product is healthy and necessary
    • Avoiding this product is healthy and necessary
    • This food is healthy and necessary
    • Sometimes eating this food is healthy and necessary
    • Avoiding this food is healthy and necessary
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Dysfunctional Eating Attitudes Scale (DEAS) Test - Description and methodology of the test

eating behavior

For people examining uneasy patterns around food, appetite, weight, or eating, the Dysfunctional Eating Attitudes Scale (DEAS) Test offers a structured self-report profile. Its eating attitudes assessment combines food judgments with questions about cravings, rigid rules, restriction, compensatory behavior, and emotional strain, so readers can see how these concerns cluster across the result. The profile highlights areas that may deserve closer attention.

What the Questionnaire Measures

Questions in this food attitude questionnaire cover beliefs, cravings, restriction, emotions, and weight anxiety. Results are six scales:

  • Food Craving (3-15) measures urge intensity; higher scores may indicate overeating: Low 3-6; Moderate 7-11; High 12-15.
  • Beliefs About Normal Eating (14-70) measures healthy-eating views: Balanced views 14-32; Mixed/rigid tendencies 33-51; Highly rigid beliefs 52-70.
  • Restrictive and Compensatory Practices (4-20) measures weight-control strategies: Low 4-9; Moderate 10-14; High 15-20.
  • Concerns About Eating and Weight Gain (4-20) measures weight anxiety: Low concern 4-9; Moderate concern 10-14; High concern 15-20.
  • Relationship With Food (12-60) measures eating attitudes: More balanced 12-27; Some difficulties 28-43; Marked difficulties 44-60.
  • Dysfunctional Eating Beliefs (37-185) measures maladaptive beliefs: Low 37-49; Moderate 50-72; High 73-185.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

The items use three response formats: judgments about whether foods are healthy or necessary, yes/no questions about experiences and practices, and five frequency choices ranging from Always to Rarely/never. Together, they sample food beliefs, appetite, restriction, emotional reactions, calorie concerns, and worries about weight.

Scoring groups responses into the six displayed scores and places each result within the stated range and band. The questionnaire does not specify per-response weights, so readers should interpret the displayed bands rather than infer a point-by-point formula. Together, the responses show how this eating behavior self-assessment organizes reported thoughts and habits across the profile.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Disordered Eating Attitude Scale, especially its attention to disordered eating attitudes, restriction, emotional responses, and weight concerns. That instrument's psychometric study evaluated it among female university students in Brazil; its findings do not establish norms or revalidation for this online version. Because self-report is shaped by current context, self-awareness, and response bias, the displayed bands are interpretive rather than diagnostic.

Literature:
  • Alvarenga, Marle dos Santos, Fernanda Baeza Scagliusi, and Sonia Tucunduva Philippi. "Development and validity of the Disordered Eating Attitude Scale (DEAS)." Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(2), 379-395, 2010. 10.2466/PMS.110.2.379-395
  • Alvarenga, Marle Santos, Raquel Franzini Pereira, Fernanda Baeza Scagliusi, Sonia Tucunduva Philippi, Camilla Chermont Prochnik Estima, and Jillian Croll. "Psychometric evaluation of the Disordered Eating Attitude Scale (DEAS). English version." Appetite, 55(2), 374-376, 2010. 10.1016/j.appet.2010.07.003

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment