Johnson Creativity Questionnaire Test
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
Johnson Creativity Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to reflect on how they handle unfamiliar problems may find the Johnson Creativity Questionnaire Test useful as a brief self-report exercise. As a creativity assessment, it can guide reflection on situations in which a respondent feels confident, hesitant, or ready to reconsider a first approach. The result gives a starting point for noticing habits that may support learning, collaboration, or everyday decisions.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire focuses on tendencies that appear amid ambiguity, choices, or obstacles. Its items cover four creative dimensions:
- Sensitivity to complexity shows how readily respondents notice subtle or layered features in a situation.
- Idea fluency indicates whether they can produce several responses instead of stopping at the first.
- Flexibility and elaboration show whether they can shift between idea types and add alternatives or details.
- Original application reflects the ability to use imagination and unconventional judgment in a workable solution.
Together, these themes describe practical creativity rather than artistic talent or intelligence. It captures self-reported indicators, including the ability to respond quickly to problem situations. Creativity Level spans 8-40, with Low 8-19, Moderate 20-26, and High 27-40. Higher scores reflect greater imagination, cognitive flexibility, and a tendency to seek novel solutions. This creative thinking questionnaire helps readers notice habits to explore in study or daily decisions.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses five ordered response options-Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, and Always-so the respondent rates how characteristic the behavior is. The questionnaire produces one displayed result rather than separate fluency, flexibility, or originality scores, and its scoring has not been standardised.
Methodologically, this version functions as a creativity test that is conceptually consistent with the Creativity Checklist, while its emphasis on fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration overlaps with Torrance's creative-thinking framework. It is not an adaptation of that published instrument. Work by Tunik is specifically associated with Johnson's questionnaire. Torrance's published predictive-validity study concerns the Torrance tests, so it should not be treated as evidence that this online questionnaire has the same validation.
Because this online self-report version has no established norms or published reliability estimates, results can be influenced by current circumstances, self-awareness, and a respondent's willingness to endorse unconventional behavior; interpret the profile as structured self-reflection and use broader evidence when important decisions depend on it.
- Johnson, David L. (1979). Creativity Checklist. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.
- Tunik, Elena E. (1997). Johnson's Creativity Questionnaire. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Pedagogical Mastery. ISBN 5-7434-0192-6.
- Torrance, E. Paul. (1972). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
- Torrance, E. Paul. (1972). Predictive Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 236-262. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x
Updated: