Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want a structured picture of how satisfying their lives feel across everyday domains may find the Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) Test useful. It is suited to self-reflection when relationships, health, work, resources, or personal direction feel uneven. As a quality of life assessment, it gives an overall view alongside domain results that can identify which valued areas deserve closer reflection.
What This Assessment Explores
Quality of life means subjective satisfaction with important areas, shaped by circumstances and personal standards. A life satisfaction questionnaire therefore considers more than mood or material conditions. Its dimensions are:
- Overall (-9-9) summarizes satisfaction across major domains; City, Neighborhood, and Home (-9-9 each) assess the opportunities, safety, comfort, and conditions of the places where you live.
- Relatives, Children, Friends, and Love (-9-9 each) show satisfaction with family ties, parenting, friendship, social support, romance, and intimacy.
- Helping Others (-9-9) reflects socially beneficial involvement; Creativity, Learning, and Play (-9-9 each) cover self-expression, development, and restorative leisure; Work (-9-9) reflects career or main activity.
- Money (-9-9) reflects financial satisfaction; Goals and Values (-9-9) cover meaning and direction; Self-Esteem (-9-9) captures self-regard; Health (-9-9) reflects subjective physical and mental well-being.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The quality of life questionnaire uses paired ratings for each life area. One set asks how important an area is, from 0 to 3; another asks how satisfied the respondent feels, from -3 to +3. This importance-weighted approach combines value and satisfaction rather than treating every domain as equally meaningful. The online profile reports an overall composite and domain scores; a range alone does not reveal how each answer contributes.
The Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI) is the source instrument named in the 1992 clinical validation study. Frisch's 1998 framework defines quality of life through life satisfaction across important domains, while the 2005 study examined predictive and treatment validity. An Australian community study reported generally adequate psychometric properties and evaluated the instrument's factor structure. The 1992 clinical validation study used US participants, but these findings do not establish that this online questionnaire has the original norms or administration conditions.
Interpret the profile as a current self-report snapshot: present circumstances, self-awareness, and response style can affect scores, so patterns across areas are more informative than a single label.
- Frisch, Michael B., John Cornell, Michael Villanueva, and Paul J. Retzlaff. “Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment.” Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 92–101, 1992. 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.92
- Frisch, Michael B. “Quality of Life Therapy and Assessment in Health Care.” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5(1), 19–40, 1998. 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00132.x
- Frisch, Michael B., Michelle P. Clark, Steven V. Rouse, M. David Rudd, Jennifer K. Paweleck, Andrew Greenstone, and David A. Kopplin. “Predictive and treatment validity of life satisfaction and the Quality of Life Inventory.” Assessment, 12(1), 66–78, 2005. 10.1177/1073191104268006
- Thomas, Matt D., Andrew McGrath, and Clive E. Skilbeck. “The psychometric properties of the Quality of Life Inventory in an Australian community sample.” Australian Journal of Psychology, 64(4), 225–234, 2012. 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2012.00054.x
Updated: