Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
cultural values

Paternalism Questionnaire Test

Take the online Paternalism Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Paternalism Questionnaire Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand attitudes toward authority, care, responsibility, and rules in about 4 minutes. A quick 20 item snapshot that supports counseling, training, and research decisions.
Start Online Test
Questions: 204 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
32,383 views
2,272 completions
2,000 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
23/35
Attitudes Toward the Law (ATtL)
Measures respect for the law versus a tendency toward legal nihilism and willingness to bypass rules when convenient.
Law-respecting
Mixed / situational
Law-bypassing tendency
516: Law-respecting | 1726: Mixed / situational | 2735: Law-bypassing tendency
A score of 23 falls in the Mixed / situational range, suggesting generally pragmatic attitudes where adherence to rules may depend on context rather than being consistent.
example score
25/35
Abdication of Responsibility (AoR)
This scale measures the tendency to relieve oneself of personal responsibility by shifting accountability and decision-making to authorities or other people.
Low
Moderate
High
514: Low | 1525: Moderate | 2635: High
A score of 25 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme inclination to delegate responsibility and accountability to others in some situations.
example score
27/35
Desire for Guardianship and Care (DfGaC)
Measures the extent to which a person expects authorities to provide care, guidance, and protection for those under their influence.
Low
Moderate
High
515: Low | 1625: Moderate | 2635: High
A score of 27 falls in the High range, suggesting a pronounced expectation that powerful authorities should take responsibility for caring for and protecting subordinates.
example score
11/35
Mystification of Authority (MoA)
Measures the tendency to personify and mystify authority by viewing power figures as omnipotent, infallible parental-like leaders.
Low mystification
Moderate mystification
High mystification
515: Low mystification | 1625: Moderate mystification | 2635: High mystification
A score of 11 falls in the Low mystification range, suggesting a generally grounded view of authority as neither omnipotent nor beyond question.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Psychology and counseling clients
41%OF USERS
People in therapy or coaching take it to see how their views on authority, responsibility, and rules shape relationships and decisions.
HR and team leaders
34%OF USERS
Managers and HR specialists use it to understand paternalistic leadership tendencies and responsibility patterns in teams.
Researchers and program designers
25%OF USERS
Social psychologists and training designers include it in surveys to map attitudes toward power, care, and compliance across groups.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Attitude towards the law (Attl)
Attitude towards the law (Attl)
Average
27.1
Normal range
21.732.4
min.
5
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Relieving Oneself of Responsibility (ROoR)
Relieving Oneself of Responsibility (ROoR)
Average
19
Normal range
13.824.2
min.
5
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Desire for care and protection (Dfcap)
Desire for care and protection (Dfcap)
Average
24.4
Normal range
20.628.2
min.
5
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
The Myth of Power (TMoP)
The Myth of Power (TMoP)
Average
19
Normal range
14.823.3
min.
5
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Not sure / neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Completely agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Completely agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Not sure / neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Paternalism Questionnaire Test

Paternalism Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs

cultural values

This measure assesses attitudes and beliefs related to paternalism, including views about authority, responsibility, and social order. The Paternalism Questionnaire provides a brief self-report format for screening individual differences in paternalistic orientations.

The instrument contains 20 items and typically takes about 4 minutes to complete. Respondents rate agreement with statements reflecting perceptions of authority, caregiving or protective impulses toward others, tendencies to defer or shift responsibility, and attitudes toward rules and norms. The Paternalism Questionnaire was developed by John T. Jost and Susan T. Fiske and may be used in research or clinical-adjacent contexts where a concise assessment of these attitudes is needed.

Author: John T. Jost, Susan T. Fiske
Literature: Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. 1999.; Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology. 2004.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment