Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
cognitive style

Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire Test

Take the online Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand whether you rely more on sensory detail or abstract concepts in about 11 minutes. Use the 57 quick items to improve communication, learning, and motivation.
Start Online Test
Questions: 5711 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
28,516 views
1,577 completions
1,387 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
16/30
Imagination (I)
Measures the tendency toward dreaminess and impressionability, with lower scores reflecting stronger imaginative capacity.
More imaginative
Balanced
Less imaginative
613: More imaginative | 1422: Balanced | 2330: Less imaginative
A score of 16 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a moderate tendency toward dreaminess and impressionability.
example score
31/50
Self-Regulation (SR)
Measures the ability to reflect on one’s actions and anticipate events, where lower scores indicate stronger self-regulation.
High self-regulation
Moderate self-regulation
Low self-regulation
1023: High self-regulation | 2436: Moderate self-regulation | 3750: Low self-regulation
A score of 31 falls in the Moderate self-regulation range, suggesting an average tendency to reflect on actions and foresee outcomes.
example score
14/40
Analytical Thinking (AT)
Measures the tendency to analyze actions, their sequence, and the deliberateness of decisions, where lower scores reflect stronger analytical thinking.
Strong analytical thinking
Moderate analytical thinking
Lower analytical thinking
818: Strong analytical thinking | 1929: Moderate analytical thinking | 3040: Lower analytical thinking
A score of 14 falls in the Strong analytical thinking range, suggesting a pronounced tendency to think through steps and decisions carefully.
example score
21/50
Willpower (W)
Assesses readiness for voluntary effort, persistence, and determination in goal-directed behavior.
Stronger willpower
Moderate willpower
Lower willpower
1023: Stronger willpower | 2436: Moderate willpower | 3750: Lower willpower
A score of 21 falls in the Stronger willpower range, suggesting relatively well-developed volitional qualities and perseverance.
example score
21/30
Imagery-Based Memory (IBM)
Assesses whether memory relies more on stable mental images versus more symbol- and logic-based encoding within the signaling systems framework.
More figurative (image-based)
Balanced
More symbolic/logical
614: More figurative (image-based) | 1522: Balanced | 2330: More symbolic/logical
A score of 21 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a fairly even use of imagery and symbolic/logical strategies in memory.
example score
21/45
Emotionality (E)
Emotionality reflects how vividly a person emotionally perceives events, their sensitivity, and potential mood variability (lower scores indicate greater emotional development).
More emotionally developed
Balanced emotionality
More restrained emotionality
921: More emotionally developed | 2233: Balanced emotionality | 3445: More restrained emotionality
A score of 21 falls in the “More emotionally developed” range, suggesting vivid emotional responsiveness and sensitivity compared with higher scores on this scale.
example score
32/40
Activity (A)
Measures overall behavioral activity, tendency toward above-norm actions, and degree of social contact, with lower scores indicating higher activity.
High activity
Moderate activity
Lower activity
818: High activity | 1929: Moderate activity | 3040: Lower activity
A score of 32 falls in the Lower activity range, suggesting comparatively less behavioral activation and social engagement than is typical on this scale.
example score
98/145
Second Signaling System (SSS)
Assesses the relative development of the second signaling system, reflecting abstract, verbal-logical processing (with lower scores indicating stronger development).
More developed
Mixed/average
Less developed
048: More developed | 4997: Mixed/average | 98145: Less developed
A score of 98 falls in the “Less developed” range, suggesting comparatively lower reliance on abstract, verbal-logical signaling and a greater tilt toward concrete, image-based processing relative to this scale.
example score
72/145
First Signaling System (FSS)
Measures how strongly a person tends to rely on concrete, sensory impressions (first signaling system) rather than abstract symbols.
More primary-signal oriented
Balanced
Less primary-signal oriented
048: More primary-signal oriented | 4997: Balanced | 98145: Less primary-signal oriented
A score of 72 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a relatively even use of concrete sensory impressions and more symbolic, abstract processing.
example score
2/66
Signaling Ratio (SR) (SR)
Assesses the balance between Pavlov’s first (sensory-imagery) and second (symbolic-abstract) signaling systems based on the signal coefficient.
Second-system dominant
Balanced
First-system dominant
-66-1: Second-system dominant | 0: Balanced | 166: First-system dominant
A score of 2 falls in the First-system dominant range, suggesting a slight preference for processing information through concrete sensory impressions over abstract symbols.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Students and adult learners
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand whether they learn better through vivid examples and sensory detail or through concepts, symbols, and theory.
Managers and team leads
34%OF USERS
They use it to adapt communication, task framing, and motivation to how each person processes information.
Psychologists and coaches
25%OF USERS
They include it in assessments to quickly identify a client’s dominant thinking style and choose suitable interventions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Imagination (I)
Imagination (I)
Average
17.3
Normal range
12.821.8
min.
6
max.
30
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Self-regulation (S)
Self-regulation (S)
Average
34.7
Normal range
28.740.8
min.
10
max.
50
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Analytical thinking (At)
Analytical thinking (At)
Average
25.6
Normal range
20.630.7
min.
8
max.
40
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Willpower (W)
Willpower (W)
Average
22.9
Normal range
1629.8
min.
10
max.
50
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Figurative Memory (FM)
Figurative Memory (FM)
Average
17.1
Normal range
13.420.9
min.
6
max.
30
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Emotionality (E)
Emotionality (E)
Average
20.2
Normal range
13.826.6
min.
9
max.
45
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Activity (A)
Activity (A)
Average
23.7
Normal range
19.228.2
min.
8
max.
40
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Second-order Signaling (SS)
Second-order Signaling (SS)
Average
80.1
Normal range
56.8103.4
min.
0
max.
145
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Primalsignalness (P)
Primalsignalness (P)
Average
108.5
Normal range
82.4134.7
min.
0
max.
145
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) (SR()
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) (SR()
Average
-21
Normal range
-45.53.5
min.
-66
max.
66
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Definitely yes
    • Probably yes
    • Somewhere in between
    • Probably no
    • No
    • Definitely yes
    • Probably yes
    • It depends
    • Probably no
    • No
    • I cannot at all
    • I can for a short time
    • It varies
    • For a long time
    • Usually, for a long time
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Questionnaire on the Balance of Signaling Systems Test

Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs

cognitive style
signal system

This measure is designed to characterize individual differences in reliance on perceptual, image-based impressions versus more abstract, symbol-mediated processing. The Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire provides an index of the relative balance between these information-processing tendencies.

The instrument consists of 57 items and typically requires about 11 minutes to complete. It is commonly used as a brief self-report screener to support clinical interviewing, psychoeducational formulation, or consultation when cognitive style may influence learning, communication, or problem-solving. The Signaling Systems Ratio Questionnaire was developed by Albert Mehrabian and is generally interpreted in terms of a relative preference for concrete, sensory-affective cues versus verbal-conceptual representations.

Author: Albert Mehrabian
Literature: McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. Guilford Press. 1990.; Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. Psychological testing. Prentice Hall. 1997.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment