Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who notice persistent fatigue, detachment from work, or changes in concentration and emotional control can use the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) Test to organize those experiences. This occupational burnout test is intended for people reflecting on work-related well-being. The result offers a structured profile of energy, engagement, thinking, emotions, and related physical complaints.
What This Assessment Explores
These dimensions organize burnout symptoms:
- Secondary Symptoms (1-5) measure psychosomatic complaints and reduced well-being: Low 1-2.84; Moderate 2.85-3.34; High 3.35-5.
- Emotional Impairment (1-5) measures regulation difficulty and resilience: Low 1-2.6; Moderate 2.7-3.4; High 3.5-5.
- Cognitive Impairment (1-5) measures concentration, memory, and thinking: Low 1-2.1; Moderate 2.2-3.5; High 3.6-5.
- Mental Distance (1-5) measures work detachment and reduced engagement: Low distancing 1-2.5; Moderate distancing 2.6-3.1; High distancing 3.2-5.
- Exhaustion (1-5) measures physical and emotional fatigue: Low 1-3.3; Elevated 3.31-3.8; High 3.81-5.
- Burnout Level (1-5) measures occupational burnout and risk: Low 1-2.58; Moderate 2.59-3.01; High 3.02-5.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Items cover exhaustion, detachment, concentration, memory, emotional reactivity, sleep, tension, and bodily complaints. The items use five frequency choices: usually Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, and Always; some endpoints read All the time or Constantly. The format asks how often experiences occur.
Responses appear on a 1-5 scale, with higher values indicating more frequent or pronounced difficulties. Bands organize the profile into lower, middle, or higher levels, while the overall result summarizes the questionnaire. Interpretation should consider workload, recovery, health, and recent changes.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the published Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), which measures core burnout experiences and related consequences. Published BAT research includes development, validity, reliability, Rasch analysis, and European cutoff studies. That evidence belongs to the instrument and does not establish this online questionnaire as a validated adaptation.
Results can serve as a burnout screening tool for reflection. Self-reported answers are shaped by memory, self-awareness, mood, sleep, illness, and workload; published BAT evidence and cutoff studies do not automatically validate these online scores, so interpret the profile alongside current circumstances rather than as a diagnosis.
- Schaufeli, W. B., De Witte, H., & Desart, S. (2020). User Manual - Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) - Version 2.0. KU Leuven, Belgium: Internal report.
- Schaufeli, W. B., Desart, S., & De Witte, H. (2020). Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)-Development, Validity, and Reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9495. 10.3390/ijerph17249495.
- Hadzibajramovic, E., Schaufeli, W., & De Witte, H. (2020). A Rasch Analysis of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). PLOS ONE, 15(11), e0242241. 10.1371/journal.pone.0242241.
- Schaufeli, W. B., De Witte, H., Hakanen, J. J., Kaltiainen, J., & Kok, R. (2023). How to assess severe burnout? Cutoff points for the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) based on three European samples. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 49(4), 293-302. 10.5271/sjweh.4093.