Alcoholism Screening Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Alcoholism Screening Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
For people seeking a structured first look at drinking-related experiences, this Alcoholism Screening Questionnaire Test organizes signs that may accompany harmful alcohol use into an accessible self-report. This alcohol screening test helps a respondent notice patterns involving memory, control, health, relationships, work, and previous attempts to stop. Its result offers a risk category to guide thoughtful next steps.
What This Assessment Measures
Questions address more than consumption itself. They cover memory gaps, tremor, morning drinking, unusual perceptions after heavy use, guilt, relationship loss, concern from relatives, work or legal difficulties, repeated drinking, and efforts to obtain help. Together, these situations examine physical and cognitive effects, impaired control, social consequences, disrupted responsibilities, and previous treatment contact.
Within this questionnaire, the main scale indicates how strongly the response pattern matches clinically significant indicators of alcohol dependence risk. The two displayed scales summarize it as follows:
- Diagnostic Coefficient Total (0-100) sums diagnostic coefficients for a more precise estimate, particularly for respondents scoring 5-9 on the main scale. Low risk range is 0-30; High risk range is 31-100.
- Total Score (0-35) reflects points from clinically significant responses. Low risk is 0-4, Intermediate is 5-8, and High risk is 9-35; intermediate results require additional assessment.
Methodology and Evidence Base
In practical use, this alcoholism questionnaire presents 22 binary items with Yes and No choices. The questions move across symptoms, loss of control, consequences, social feedback, and treatment history. Responses are combined into two displayed scores; the scoring format identifies clinically significant responses and coefficient sums but does not provide a point-by-point key, so score ranges should not be used to infer how much each answer contributes.
John E. Helzer's version 4 Alcoholism Screening Questionnaire documents the 22-item format and a scoring method that combines clinically significant responses with diagnostic coefficients. This online questionnaire is not a standardized administration of that source instrument. The MMPI-2 manual by Butcher and colleagues supplies background on the parent inventory, not evidence for this questionnaire's scoring method or norms.
This questionnaire has no stated norms, reliability estimates, or clinical validation in the form presented. Because the result depends on honest recall, self-awareness, and current circumstances, it is best interpreted as a structured indication of risk that may support fuller assessment, especially when scores are intermediate or high.
- MacAndrew, C. (1965). The differentiation of male alcoholic outpatients from nonalcoholic psychiatric outpatients by means of the MMPI. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 26, 238-246. 10.15288/qjsa.1965.26.238
- Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1990). MMPI-2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Updated: