Social Role Adequacy Test
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Social Role Adequacy Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine how they participate in family life can use this questionnaire to reflect on responsibility, cooperation, independence, and boundaries. The Social Role Adequacy Test is intended for respondents considering their own relationships with parents, siblings, or other close family members. A social role adequacy assessment can help identify patterns worth discussing or reconsidering without reducing family functioning to a single personal trait.
What This Assessment Explores
At its core, the questionnaire examines whether behavior fits expected responsibilities within family relationships. The result concerns role adequacy: joining shared tasks, responding to requests, managing practical duties, balancing family and friends, and handling expectations or control. It also touches autonomy, resentment, conflict, and independent action.
The themes below explain what the item groups ask the respondent to consider:
- Shared involvement reflects the respondent’s ability to participate in family tasks when cooperation is needed.
- Practical responsibility reflects self-care and reliable completion of ordinary requests.
- Independence and boundaries describe the balance between family influence and personal plans.
- Relationship regulation concerns disagreement, criticism, and harmony between family and social life.
Taken as a family role assessment, the result describes tendencies in the situations covered by these items and how family responsibilities are handled there.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses Yes/No responses, so this social role adequacy questionnaire has a brief self-report format. Results are reported through the Role Adequacy Coefficient, displayed with a range of 1-1; its item-level key and weighting are not specified, so no points should be inferred for either response.
The displayed range is 1-1. Bands are Below threshold (1-0.563), Low (0.563-0.664), and Medium or high (0.664-1); the definition further identifies 0.664-0.747 as moderate and 0.747-1.000 as high. Scores below 0.563 are insufficient for meaningful interpretation; higher values indicate better role fulfillment and greater consistency in family actions.
Torokhtii’s 2006 Social-Role Adequacy methodology is the closest conceptual reference. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with it, but its bands are not independently established norms. Kostarev’s 2017 study addresses spouses’ mental health disorders in divorce, while Kramchenkova’s 2016 work examines family psychological health; both offer context rather than validation of this online form.
Self-report answers can reflect current conflict, memory, social desirability, and self-awareness. The bands are provided as interpretations, so the result is a structured starting point for reflection, not a standalone clinical conclusion.
- Torokhtii, V. S. (2006). Methodology for Diagnosing the Psychological Health of the Family (4th revised and expanded ed.). Moscow: Moscow City Psychological-Pedagogical University, 100 pp.
- Kostarev, V. V. (2017). Psychological Predictors of Mental Health Disorders in Spouses in a Divorce Situation. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Narcology, 2017(3), 64-70. 10.26617/1810-3111-2017-3(96)-64-70.
- Kramchenkova, V. O. (2016). Value Orientations of Spouses as a Factor of the Psychological Health of the Family. Problems of Modern Psychology, 33, 327-338.
Updated: