Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
social intelligence

Social Intelligence Scale Test

Take the online Social Intelligence Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Social Intelligence Scale Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for quick self-reflection, the Social Intelligence Scale Test contains 30 questions and takes about 6 minutes to complete. It explores emotional awareness, self-regulation, empathy, motivation, and social engagement, helping you recognize personal strengths and areas for development in communication and everyday relationships.
Questions: 306 minutes
Social Intelligence Scale Test: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
19,650 views
3,363 completions
1,772 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,772 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Self-MotivationSM
Measures how well a teenager can set goals and sustain effort toward them without external pressure.
example score2/6
2/6Lowexample score
0 – 2Low
3 – 4Moderate
5 – 6High
A score of 2 indicates low self-motivation, suggesting goals may be harder to pursue consistently without outside prompts.
SociabilityS
Measures how easily a teenager initiates and maintains communication, shows interest in others, and cooperates in interaction.
example score1/6
1/6Lowexample score
0 – 2Low
3 – 4Moderate
5 – 6High
A score of 1 indicates low sociability, suggesting it may be harder to initiate contact or engage in dialogue without additional support or structure.
EmpathyE
Empathy measures how well a teenager can recognize, understand, and consider other people’s feelings and perspectives.
example score3/6
3/6Moderateexample score
0 – 2Low
3 – 4Moderate
5 – 6High
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of empathy, meaning the teen can often understand others’ feelings but may do so inconsistently in more complex or emotionally charged situations.
Self-RegulationSR
Self-regulation measures how well a teenager can manage and control their emotional reactions and behavior in challenging situations.
example score3/6
3/6Moderateexample score
0 – 2Low
3 – 4Moderate
5 – 6High
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of self-regulation, meaning emotional control is generally present but may be inconsistent under stress or in conflict.
Self-AwarenessSA
Measures how well a teenager recognizes and understands their own emotions, motives, and needs.
example score4/6
4/6Moderateexample score
0 – 2Low
3 – 4Moderate
5 – 6High
A score of 4 indicates a moderate level of self-awareness, meaning emotions and motives are usually recognized but may be inconsistent in more complex situations.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

School psychologists and counselors
41%OF USERS
Use it for quick screening to spot which teens need support with self-control, empathy, motivation, or communication.
Teachers and class leaders
34%OF USERS
Run it with a class to understand group dynamics and prevent conflicts by strengthening social skills.
Concerned parents of teens
25%OF USERS
Take it with their child to clarify what causes social difficulties and what to practice at home and school.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Self-MotivationS
You?
Average3.4
Typical rangeTypical2.4 – 4.5
Possible0 – 6
SociabilityS
You?
Average2.3
Typical rangeTypical1.4 – 3.1
Possible0 – 6
EmpathyE
You?
Average3.7
Typical rangeTypical2.7 – 4.8
Possible0 – 6
Self-RegulationS
You?
Average2.9
Typical rangeTypical1.9 – 3.8
Possible0 – 6
Self-awarenessS
You?
Average1.9
Typical rangeTypical1.1 – 2.7
Possible0 – 6
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Social Intelligence Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

social intelligence

People who want to understand their conduct at work, in relationships, and around unfamiliar people can use this assessment as structured self-reflection. The Social Intelligence Scale Test is intended for readers considering how their interpersonal style may support or complicate cooperation, communication, and personal development. As a social intelligence assessment, it produces a profile that can highlight personal resources and areas worth developing in everyday or professional interactions.

What This Assessment Explores

The questions connect emotional processes with everyday social situations. They cover noticing feelings, recovering from disappointment, sustaining effort, reading facial expressions, approaching unfamiliar people, listening patiently, and helping others. These themes relate to cooperation, communication, leadership, service, and personal development.

This social intelligence profile brings emotional insight and interpersonal engagement together across five dimensions. The result shows a pattern rather than one label:

  • Self-Motivation: 0-6 shows goal-setting and sustained effort; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-4, High 5-6.
  • Sociability: 0-6 shows interest in people and cooperation; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-4, High 5-6.
  • Empathy: 0-6 shows perspective-taking and consideration of feelings; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-4, High 5-6.
  • Self-Regulation: 0-6 shows management of emotional states and recovery after upset; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-4, High 5-6.
  • Self-Awareness: 0-6 shows recognition of emotions, motives, and needs; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-4, High 5-6.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Every statement has a Yes/No response and concerns emotional reactions, social perception, motivation, or interaction. The questionnaire displays a separate result for each dimension. The displayed range shows the possible result for each dimension, but the questionnaire does not explain how individual answers contribute to those results, so a single answer should be interpreted within the full profile.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Hall's 1999 emotional-intelligence self-evaluation, but it is not presented as an adaptation of that instrument. Goleman's 1995 synthesis and Salovey and Mayer's 1990 model provide related theoretical context, while O'Sullivan and Guilford's 1976 work represents a separate social-intelligence framework. The online social intelligence questionnaire shares related themes with these sources, but it is not presented as a reproduction of any one instrument or manual.

This is a self-report measure, so mood, recent experiences, social desirability, and self-awareness can influence answers. Interpretation should therefore consider the full pattern across dimensions and the situations in which the respondent usually works, relates to others, or meets unfamiliar people, rather than treating one result as a fixed judgment.

Author: J. P. Guilford
Literature:
  • Hall, N. (1999). Emotional Intelligence Self-Evaluation.
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211. 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG
  • O'Sullivan, M., & Guilford, J. P. (1976). Four Factor Tests of Social Intelligence (Behavioral Cognition): Manual of Instructions and Interpretations. Orange, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment