Basic Aspirations Test

Understand what motivates you at a deep level in just 3 minutes. With 16 questions, it delivers a clear snapshot of your core drives and potential inner conflicts to guide growth and goals.

Start Online Test

Questions: 163 minutes

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

32,018 views

3,912 completions

3,243 likes

Verified by Daniel Hall

Psychologist with 25 years of experience

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

3/5

Harmony of Aspiration Fulfillment (HoAF)

Measures how harmoniously a person fulfills their basic drives in everyday behavior and goal pursuit.

Low harmony

Moderate harmony

High harmony

1 – 3.19: Low harmony | 3.2 – 4.2: Moderate harmony | 4.21 – 5: High harmony

A score of 3 suggests lower overall harmony in fulfilling aspirations, indicating that some drives may be harder to realize consistently and could feel somewhat conflicting.

example score

3/5

Level of Harmony of Basic Aspirations (LoHoBA)

Measures how balanced and mutually supportive a person’s basic motivational drives are, indicating overall harmony versus internal tension.

Low harmony

Moderate harmony

High harmony

1 – 3.59: Low harmony | 3.6 – 4.6: Moderate harmony | 4.61 – 5: High harmony

A score of 3 suggests low harmony, meaning the basic drives may feel less coordinated and could create occasional inner tension or inconsistency in motivation.

example score

63/100

Predominance of Positive Realization Strength (PoPRS)

Measures how strongly positive fulfillment of basic drives predominates over negative, maladaptive tendencies.

Low predominance

High predominance

0 – 64: Low predominance | 65 – 100: High predominance

A score of 63 falls in the Low predominance range, suggesting positive realization of basic drives is present but does not clearly outweigh negative tendencies.

example score

62/100

Dominance of Positive Aspirational Strength (DoPAS)

Measures how strongly positive basic drives outweigh negative, life-suppressing motivations.

Negative tilt

Positive tilt

Strong positive dominance

0 – 64: Negative tilt | 65 – 90: Positive tilt | 91 – 100: Strong positive dominance

A score of 62 falls in the Negative tilt range, suggesting positive aspirations are present but do not consistently outweigh inhibiting or life-suppressing motivations.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Self-explorers and planners

41%OF USERS

People who want a quick, clear picture of their inner motives to make better choices in work, relationships, and personal goals.

Coaching and therapy clients

34%OF USERS

Those already working on change who want to identify strong drives and inner conflicts that shape their behavior.

Teens and parents

25%OF USERS

Adolescents and their parents who want to understand what energizes or blocks the teen during study, social life, and self-determination.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Level of harmonious fulfillment of aspirations (Lohfoa)

Average

3.3

Normal range

2.8 — 3.8

min.

max.

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Level of Harmony of Basic Drives (LoHoBD)

Average

2.4

Normal range

1.9 — 2.9

min.

max.

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Predominance of the power of positive realization (Potpopr)

Average

72.2

Normal range

57.1 — 87.4

min.

max.

100

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

The predominance of the power of positive aspirations (Tpotpopa)

Average

71.6

Normal range

59.4 — 83.8

min.

max.

100

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Start Online Test

Featured On

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Please rate the strength of your primary life aspirations, and then rate the extent and manner in which they are realized in your life, in your behavior, and in your feelings. Consider the past month of your daily functioning. Do not attempt to create a favorable impression. If you have difficulty responding, base your answers on your most frequent experiences and states.

- Very weak aspiration
- Weak aspiration
- Moderate aspiration
- Strong aspiration
- Very strong aspiration
- Very weak aspiration
- Weak aspiration
- Moderate aspiration
- Strong aspiration
- Very strong aspiration
- Very weak
- Weak
- Moderate in strength
- Strong
- Very strong

These are 3 of the 16 real questions — the rest appear in the test. No sign-up needed to start.

Start Online Test

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Basic Aspirations Test - Symptoms and Signs

harmony

This self-report measure is designed to assess broad motivational priorities and perceived fulfillment of personally important aims. Basic Aspirations is commonly used to support an initial discussion of value- and goal-related themes in clinical, counseling, or research contexts.

The questionnaire contains 16 items and typically requires about 3 minutes to complete. Items ask respondents to rate the importance of different aspiration domains and, in some formats, the extent to which these aims are being realized.

Basic Aspirations is associated with work by Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan and may be used as a brief indicator of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal orientations. Results are generally interpreted as descriptive and should be considered alongside clinical interview data and other assessment information.

Author: Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan