Motivational Questionnaire: Now or Later Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Now
- Later
- Now
- Later
- Now
- Later
Motivational Questionnaire: Now or Later Test - Description and methodology of the test
Readers comparing obligations, pleasures, and ambitions may use the Motivational Questionnaire: Now or Later Test to clarify which trade-offs feel most compelling. This now or later questionnaire offers a structured profile for interpreting tensions among relationships, achievement, leisure, status, and personal aspirations, rather than judging ability.
What This Assessment Explores
As a future orientation test, it contrasts immediate rewards with delayed goals. It shows priorities, interests, importance, and focus.
These dimensions are:
- Present pleasures are measured by Love Affair, Resort Vacation, Expensive Restaurant, Date, Acquaintance With a Celebrity, Book, TV Series, Theater, Concert, Party, and Fun Company (each 0-3).
- Helping a Friend (0-3) reflects support for others; Earn $10,000 (0-3) reflects material achievement, with lower, moderate, or higher focus.
- Future goals include Live to 150, Honor and Respect, Professionalism, Own Child, Luxury Car, Happy Family, Noble Act, Own Apartment, Creative Achievement, and Good Education (each 0-3), covering longevity, status, work, family, altruism, and ownership.
- Future Orientation (0-30) measures planning and long-term goals, with Present-focused, Balanced, and Future-focused bands; Present (0-30) measures immediate enjoyment, with Future-leaning, Balanced, and Present-focused bands.
Smaller scales use low, moderate, or high priority, focus, interest, and importance bands.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a forced choice between a Now experience and a Later achievement, relationship, value, or life goal. The questionnaire does not state how each response maps to a displayed scale, so results should be read through the reported scales rather than as a single personality score.
This contrast makes it a present and future motivation test conceptually consistent with the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale, which examines attention to immediate and distant outcomes, and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. It is not an adaptation of either measure. Higgins’s motivational account of pleasure and pain, alongside Atkinson and Birch’s dynamic view of competing action tendencies, supplies theoretical context for competing immediate incentives and future aims.
Results use the labels and ranges shown for this questionnaire; they do not by themselves establish clinical thresholds. Self-report choices can shift with mood, circumstances, values, and self-awareness, so read the profile as a current snapshot when goals, rewards, and obligations compete.
- Strathman, Alan, Faith Gleicher, David S. Boninger, and C. Scott Edwards. "The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, no. 4 (1994): 742-752. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
- Zimbardo, Philip G., and John N. Boyd. "Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, no. 6 (1999): 1271-1288. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
- Higgins, E. Tory. "Beyond Pleasure and Pain." American Psychologist 52, no. 12 (1997): 1280-1300. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
- Atkinson, John W., and David Birch. The Dynamics of Action. New York: Wiley, 1970.
Updated: