Family Myth Analysis Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- This is probably not true
- Neither yes nor no
- Generally true
- Strongly agree
- Completely disagree
- This is unlikely to be true
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Generally true
- Completely agree
- Strongly disagree
- Probably not true
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Generally agree
- Strongly agree
Family Myth Analysis Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers examining assumptions about marriage, parenting, loyalty, conflict, and family duty, the Family Myth Analysis Test offers a structured way to notice beliefs that may otherwise feel like common sense. It can support a family myth questionnaire approach to comparing idealized expectations with more flexible views of changing family life. The result gives a focused profile for self-reflection and discussion.
What This Test Measures
As a family relationship beliefs assessment, it measures:
- Myth of Constant Family Well-Being (5-25) measures happiness expectations: Flexible view 5-11; Moderate expectation 12-18; Strong expectation 19-25.
- Myth of the Necessity of Sacrifice for the Family (5-25) measures sacrifice: Low 5-11; Moderate 12-18; High 19-25.
- Myth of Malevolent Forces Attacking the Family (5-25) measures blame: Low 5-11; Moderate 12-18; High 19-25.
- Myth of Absolutizing Family Situations (5-25) measures rigidity: Flexible view 5-11; Mixed flexibility 12-18; Rigid stereotypes 19-25.
- Myth of the Magical Power of Love (5-25) measures love’s power: Pragmatic approach 5-11; Mixed beliefs 12-18; Love as a cure-all 19-25.
- Myth of Eternal Love (5-25) measures permanence: Flexible expectations 5-11; Moderate stability ideal 12-18; Strong “everlasting love” belief 19-25.
- Overall Mythologization of Family Relationships (0-30) measures mythologization: Low mythologization 0-10; Moderate mythologization 11-20; High mythologization 21-30.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Statements cover marriage, parenting, loyalty, conflict, outside influence, duty, and love. Respondents select one of five ordered options, from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with a neutral midpoint. The format measures endorsement of each belief rather than factual knowledge.
As a family myth assessment, the questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Analysis of Family Myth (Nesterova, 2017), the closest published source for its six domains and overall focus. This identifies shared constructs, not proof that this questionnaire reproduces the source instrument, sample, administration, or norms.
Scoring treats stronger agreement with a myth-oriented statement as a higher contribution to its dimension; the overall index summarizes the broader pattern. The displayed bands describe this profile, not universal clinical cutoffs.
Vasilchenko (2013) offers a related perspective on family and reproductive behavior, including structured examination of roles, sacrifice, and family expectations. Self-report answers can shift with current circumstances, insight, or the wish to appear favorable, so interpretation is strongest alongside lived context.
- Nesterova, Albina A. (2017). Development and Validation of Diagnostic Questionnaire "Analysis of Family Myth." Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Psychological Sciences, 2017(1), 33-49. 10.18384/2310-7235-2017-1-33-49
- Vasilchenko, Olga N. (2013). Reproductive Behavior: Diagnostic Possibilities. Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education, 10(2), 119-126.