Relationship Diagnostic Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- This quality is absent
- This quality is weakly expressed
- This quality is moderately expressed
- This quality is fully expressed
- This quality is absent
- This quality is mildly expressed
- This quality is moderately expressed
- This quality is fully expressed
- Not present
- Slightly present
- Moderately present
- Fully present
Relationship Diagnostic Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine how they describe themselves and social groups may use this self-report assessment as a structured prompt for reflection. The Relationship Diagnostic Test is intended for readers curious about the emotional tone of these judgments. It compares four target representations-self, an idealized image, one’s own nationality, and another nationality-and keeps interpretation focused on positive, negative, or ambivalent/uncertain orientations.
What This Assessment Explores
The items compare self, an ideal, one’s own nationality, and another nationality. This attitude profile indicates positive, negative, or ambivalent/uncertain orientation. The four displayed scales organize the result:
- Other Nationality (-1-1) measures emotional orientation toward another ethnic group: Negative orientation (-1--0.7), Ambivalent/uncertain (-0.7-0.7), or Positive orientation (0.7-1).
- D: Own Nationality (-1-1) reflects emotional orientation toward one’s own ethnic group: Negative stereotype (-1-0), Ambivalent/uncertain (0-0.7), or Positive stereotype (0.7-1).
- D Coefficient (Ideal) (-1-1) reflects emotional orientation toward an idealized representation: Negative orientation (-1--0.7), Ambivalent/uncertain (-0.7-0.7), or Positive orientation (0.7-1).
- D: Self (-1-1) reflects emotional orientation toward oneself: Negative self-attitude (-1--0.7), Ambivalent/uncertain (-0.7-0.7), or Positive self-attitude (0.7-1).
Methodology and Evidence Base
Four ordered choices accompany each statement, from absent or weakly expressed to fully expressed. The questionnaire includes self-descriptions, ideal descriptions, and judgments of typical national representatives; its ethnic-group attitudes concern the two nationality targets. Results are reported through the displayed target-specific D scales.
Scores are diagnostic stereotype coefficients, D. Positive values indicate positive attitudes, negative values indicate negative orientation, and values near zero indicate uncertainty. The questionnaire displays these bands, but no point-by-point scoring rule is documented, so answer weights should not be inferred.
Methodological context is consistent with the Diagnostic Test of Relations associated with Soldatova’s work on interethnic stereotypes, alongside related work by Valiev and colleagues on ethnic worldview and by Soldatova and Shaigerova on personality tolerance. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that source instrument; standardization evidence is not reported for this online version.
No norms, reliability estimates, or clinical cutoffs are reported. The result is best read as a reflective snapshot; self-awareness, wording interpretation, and current context can influence responses, and broader assessment requires additional evidence.
- Soldatova, G. U. Psychology of Interethnic Tension. Moscow: Smysl, 1998. 386 pp. ISBN 5-89357-029-4.
- Valiev, R. A., Valieva, T. V., Maksimova, L. A., and Karimova, V. G. "Readiness for Interaction with Inoethnic Subjects of Education and Ethnic Worldview." Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(1), 2016, 138-154. 10.11621/pir.2016.0110.
- Soldatova, G. U., and Shaigerova, L. A., eds. Psychodiagnostics of Personality Tolerance. Moscow: Smysl, 2008. 172 pp. ISBN 978-5-89357-244-5.
Updated: