Adolescent Early Substance Use Disorder Screening Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Adolescent Early Substance Use Disorder Screening Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
Adults who know an adolescent well can use the result to organize concern across two dimensions: overall risk severity and symptom count. The Adolescent Early Substance Use Disorder Screening Questionnaire Test turns observations about mood, school, health, secrecy, possessions, and legal problems into a structured profile. By using yes-or-no observations, the adolescent substance use screening tool organizes concerns without treating one striking incident as decisive.
What This Assessment Explores
The items focus on observable changes concerning adults responsible for an adolescent’s wellbeing. They cover school decline, withdrawal, mood instability, reduced self-care, memory problems, physical signs, drug-related talk or materials, missing property, intoxication, and substance-linked conduct.
Its role in substance use disorder screening for adolescents is to organize a structured profile rather than judge one sign. Stress, illness, conflict, or other difficulties can produce similar observations, so the result needs context.
The two displayed indicators are:
- Total Score (2-4900) indicates overall severity of risk for developing a substance use disorder across endorsed symptoms. Its bands are Lower risk (2-2000) and Higher risk (2001-4900).
- Number of Symptoms (0-38) counts identified symptoms that may indicate possible development of substance dependence; higher values suggest greater concern and a need for further monitoring. Its bands are Low indicators (0-10) and Elevated indicators (11-38).
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses a Yes/No response. The scoring combines endorsed indicators into an overall risk score and a separate symptom count, but the answer value assigned to each response is not specified; it should not be inferred from the displayed ranges. The output is therefore a structured screening profile rather than a frequency scale.
The questionnaire is an online checklist rather than a verbatim reproduction or validated adaptation of a published instrument. Its relationship to published work is conceptual, so the displayed scores describe this questionnaire’s screening profile rather than established norms for another scale.
Piehler and colleagues (2020) show that parent and adolescent reports about alcohol or cannabis use do not always coincide, so observer answers can miss or reinterpret experiences that the young person would describe differently.
Interpretation should treat this as an adolescent substance use risk assessment. The online version is not presented with independent norms, reliability coefficients, or clinical validation, so its displayed bands function as screening indicators rather than established diagnostic cutoffs.
- Elena Valeryevna Zmanovskaya. Deviantology: Psychology of Deviant Behavior. Moscow: Akademiya, 2003. 288 pp. ISBN 5-7695-1248-2.
- Mikhail G. Dmitriev. Practicum on Psychodiagnostics of Deviant Behavior in Difficult Adolescents. Saint Petersburg: PONI, 2008. 263 pp.
- Galina A. Korchagina, Elena V. Fadeeva, Nina I. Zentsova, and Anna A. Grigorieva. Organization of Measures for Early Detection of Psychoactive Substance Use in Educational Institutions: Methodological Recommendations. Moscow: National Research Center for Narcology, 2012. 53 pp.
- Timothy F. Piehler, Sun-Kyung Lee, Ali Stockness, and Ken C. Winters. The Correspondence of Parent-Reported Measures of Adolescent Alcohol and Cannabis Use with Adolescent-Reported Measures: A Systematic Review. Substance Abuse. 2020;41(4):437-450. 10.1080/08897077.2019.1692123.
Updated: