Autoaggression and Heteroaggression Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Autoaggression and Heteroaggression Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand whether conflict is expressed through self-blame, verbal hostility, or restraint can use this assessment as a structured starting point. The Autoaggression and Heteroaggression Test is especially relevant to readers reflecting on anger, interpersonal boundaries, and reactions after mistakes. As an aggression self-assessment, it organizes these patterns into a result that can guide more precise self-observation.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire considers outward reactions alongside impulses turned against the self. Its items touch on self-criticism, self-blame, cursing, threats, shouting, insults, and efforts to restrain retaliation. Here, outward and self-directed aggression describe tendencies in these situations rather than a fixed identity.
The displayed scales and recurring item theme are:
- Heteroaggression (0-10) measures aggressive reactions toward other people or external objects; higher scores may indicate pronounced outward aggression and poorer impulse control. Bands: Low 0-3, Moderate 4-6, High 7-10.
- Autoaggression (0-10) measures impulses directed toward the self through self-criticism, self-blame, or self-destructive behavior; higher scores may indicate internal conflict and difficulty expressing aggression outward. Bands: Low 0-3, Moderate 4-6, High 7-10.
- Conflict restraint is not a separate scale; items show it through efforts to avoid insults, shouting, or forceful retaliation during conflict.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement presents a recognizable situation, and the respondent selects Yes or No. The items move between self-directed and other-directed reactions involving mistakes, disagreement, debt, provocation, and arguments. Results summarize the pattern across the two dimensions; the online questionnaire has no stated weighting rule, norms, reliability estimates, validation, or clinical thresholds beyond the displayed score bands, so the output is best read as a comparative profile.
Conceptually, this auto- and heteroaggression questionnaire is consistent with Ilyin's 2004 discussion of individual differences; it is not presented as an adaptation of that work. Research by Ekimova, Golik, and Levchenko examines links among aggression, auto-aggression, and self-attitude, offering related conceptual context for the two directions measured here. The items make the distinction concrete through self-reproach, verbal attacks, threats, and shouting during conflict.
In practice, the result is most useful when considered alongside recent stress, relationship context, and habitual coping. Self-report is affected by current mood, self-awareness, and willingness to answer frankly, so a score can change across situations and should not be treated as a diagnosis.
- Ekimova, V. I., Golik, T. Y., and Levchenko, A. V. (2025). Aggression and auto-aggression in the mirror of adolescents' self-attitude. Extreme Psychology and Personal Safety, 2(2), 170-189. 10.17759/epps.2025020210
- Ilyin, E. P. (2004). Psychology of Individual Differences. Saint Petersburg: Piter. 701 pp.
- Govorov, S. A., Solondaev, V. K., Oleychik, M. I., and Ivanova, E. M. (2025). Individual and perceived social attitudes towards suicide in relation to suicide risk. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 33(3), 81-104. 10.17759/cpp.2025330304
Updated: