Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory (AMI) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory (AMI) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine how they interpret men, masculinity, dependence, protection, and power may use this questionnaire for structured self-reflection. The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory (AMI) Test presents a profile of related beliefs rather than one overall attitude score. An attitudes toward men questionnaire can help readers notice tensions in expectations about intimacy, care, and social control.
What This Assessment Explores
Results show patterns across dependence, intimacy, and power. A gender role beliefs assessment covers dimensions:
- Compensatory Gender Differentiation (0-5) measures men's domestic dependence (Low endorsement 0-1; Moderate endorsement 2-3; High endorsement 4-5). Maternalism (0-5) measures men's need for nurturing (Low 0-1; Moderate 2-3; High 4-5).
- Complementary Gender Differentiation (0-5) measures protective-provider beliefs (Low endorsement 0-1.6; Moderate endorsement 1.7-3.3; High endorsement 3.4-5). Benevolence Toward Men (0-5) measures positive protector-provider beliefs (Low 0-1.6; Moderate 1.7-3.3; High 3.4-5).
- Heterosexual Intimacy (0-5) measures women's need for men (Low 0-1; Moderate 2-3; High 4-5). Heterosexual Hostility (0-5) measures male dominance in relationships (Low 0-1.6; Moderate 1.7-3.3; High 3.4-5).
- Hostility Toward Men (0-5) measures negative views of dominant, weak men (Low hostility 0-1; Moderate hostility 2-3; High hostility 4-5). Resentment of Paternalism (0-5) measures male power-seeking (Low resentment 0-1.6; Moderate resentment 1.7-3.3; High resentment 3.4-5).
Methodology and Evidence Base
Every statement uses six ordered choices from strong disagreement to strong agreement, addressing domestic care, intimacy, protection, risk, or social control. This response format captures degree of endorsement rather than a yes-or-no position.
Responses are combined into separate scale scores, producing a multidimensional profile rather than a total score. Higher values indicate stronger endorsement of the tendency represented by a scale. The online version does not establish population norms or a published per-answer weighting, so its bands describe this questionnaire's output rather than universal cutoffs.
Its conceptual anchor is Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory (Glick & Fiske, 1999), which distinguishes negative and benevolent beliefs within ambivalent sexism theory across power, gender differentiation, and heterosexuality. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument, not presented as an adaptation of its published scoring system.
Krivoshchekov, Gulevich, and Lyubkina (2018) evaluated a Russian version, including its factor structure, consistency, and validity. Those findings support the construct's study but cannot be transferred directly to this English online profile. An ambivalence toward men scale is also sensitive to current relationships, social desirability, and self-awareness, so interpret patterns in personal context.
- Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Beliefs About Men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 519-536. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x
- Krivoshchekov, V. S., Gulevich, O. A., & Lyubkina, A. S. (2018). Hostile and Benevolent Attitudes toward Men: Psychometric Properties of the Russian Version of the Ambivalence toward Men Inventory. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 15(3), 427-446. 10.17323/1813-8918-2018-3-427-446