Intrapersonal Gender Role Conflict Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Mostly disagree
- No definite opinion
- Mostly agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Mostly disagree
- No definite opinion
- Mostly agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Mostly disagree
- No definite opinion
- Mostly agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Intrapersonal Gender Role Conflict Test - Description and methodology of the test
People reflecting on competing expectations in family life, partnership, work, and identity may find this questionnaire useful. The Intrapersonal Gender Role Conflict Test describes where an actual sense of self may diverge from idealized roles and where that tension is felt most strongly. A gender role conflict self-assessment can help organize recurring worries without reducing a person to a single score.
What This Test Measures
The gender role conflict profile covers:
- Self as a Mother (0-60) measures good-mother anxiety, compensation: Low conflict 0-22; Moderate conflict 23-46; High conflict 47-60.
- Self as Homemaker (0-60) measures homemaker guilt, strain: Low strain 0-20; Moderate strain 21-39; High strain 40-60.
- Self as a Wife (0-60) measures spousal anxiety, manipulation risk: Low conflict 0-20; Moderate conflict 21-47; High conflict 48-60.
- Professional Self (0-60) measures work dissatisfaction, overwork: Low 0-15; Moderate 16-44; High 45-60.
- Gender Self (0-60) measures gender-image discrepancy anxiety and spending: Low conflict 0-12; Moderate conflict 13-47; High conflict 48-60.
- Overall Index of Intrapersonal Gender Role Conflict (0-300) measures conflict; higher tension, lower harmony: Low conflict 0-105; Moderate conflict 106-208; High conflict 209-300.
Methodology and Research Context
The self-report uses a role-conflict approach: statements are answered on seven-point agreement options from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with a middle option for uncertainty. The wording covers care, housework, partnership, work, appearance, and gender expectations.
Scoring provides domain results and a combined index. Higher bands indicate more tension in each area; the overall result summarizes the pattern, not its cause. Ranges do not show points added per response or identical item weighting. This intrapersonal gender role conflict questionnaire is best read as a profile, not a verdict.
Conceptually, it aligns with the IGRC questionnaire described in Lopukhova's 2024 work. Lopukhova's 2010 and Shakirova's 2014 works are theoretical and contextual sources, not validation studies of this online version. Displayed bands organize interpretation but do not establish norms or formal standardization. Self-report answers can shift with current stress, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose; the result indicates perceived tension, not a diagnosis.
- Lopukhova, Olga G. (2024). Five-factor model and diagnostic questionnaire of intrapersonal gender role conflict. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 17(3), 25-45. 10.11621/TEP-24-23
- Shakirova, Gulshat Firazovna. (2014). Intrapersonal Gender Role Conflict of Self-Actualized Personality. World Applied Sciences Journal, 30(4), 460-462.
- Lopukhova, Olga G. (2010). Intrapersonal gender role conflict: A systematic approach to the problem. Modern Research of Social Problems, 4, 113-119.
Updated: