Personal Resilience Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Personal Resilience Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want a clearer picture of how they respond to pressure, change, and everyday demands can use the Personal Resilience Scale Test as a structured self-report assessment. As a personal resilience assessment, it offers a practical profile for noticing patterns and deciding where deliberate self-reflection may be most useful.
What This Assessment Explores
This personal resilience questionnaire measures:
- Activity and Initiative (12-72; Low 12-31; Moderate 32-56; High 57-72) reflects persistence.
- Self-Organization (12-72; Low 12-31; Moderate 32-51; High 52-72) / Adaptive Coping Styles (12-72; Low adaptiveness 12-37; Moderate adaptiveness 38-60; High adaptiveness 61-72) cover planning.
- Social Competence (12-72; Lower 12-40; Moderate 41-58; Higher 59-72) / Self-Esteem (12-72; Low 12-37; Moderate 38-60; High 61-72) cover support.
- Positive Attitudes (12-72; Low 12-36; Moderate 37-59; High 60-72) / Emotional Control (12-72; Low control 12-30; Moderate control 31-52; High control 53-72) cover regulation.
- Self-Motivation and Achievement (12-72; Low 12-32; Moderate 33-56; High 57-72) / Overall Resilience Index (96-576; Low vitality 96-312; Moderate vitality 313-477; High vitality 478-576) cover resilience.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Six agreement choices run from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. Statements address goals, time use, emotional reactions, social support, confidence, openness, and hardship. Results report domain scores and an overall index; displayed bands categorize them within the profile.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Resilience of Person Questionnaire (Nesterova, 2017), but equivalence to that published instrument has not been established. Nesterova reported a standardized 96-item measure with eight components and reliability and validity evidence from more than 2,500 people; those findings do not automatically transfer to this online version.
Makhnach (2017) presents resilience in a broader framework involving self-efficacy, persistence, coping, adaptation, internal control, spirituality, and family or social relationships. The online questionnaire assesses the displayed dimensions, not every framework construct; its resilience profile therefore reflects measured resources.
Across the displayed scales, higher scores indicate more of each defined tendency. No independent norming or item-weighting rule is stated, so the bands categorize results within the profile rather than against a normative population. Self-report is sensitive to stress, self-awareness, and response style; use the pattern to guide reflection, not as a diagnosis.
- Nesterova, Albina A. (2017). Development and validation of “Resilience of Person” questionnaire. Psychological Journal, 38(4), 93-108. 10.7868/S0205959217040080
- Makhnach, Alexander V. (2017). Human resilience as a research object in psychology. Psychological Journal, 38(4), 5-16. 10.7868/S0205959217040018
Updated: