Street Peer Group Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Every day
- Every other day
- Less often
- In a basement or wandering around on the street
- On the area in front of the building or in the entranceway
- At someone’s apartment
- One
- Several
- None
Street Peer Group Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers who want to understand how their everyday group environment may shape choices, the Street Peer Group Test offers a focused look at peer dynamics rather than an isolated personal trait. This peer group assessment centers on the degree of prosocial orientation in the group, while the items provide context about atmosphere, habits, leadership, conflict, pressure, and substance use.
What This Assessment Explores
The items treat the peer group as a social environment. They ask about meeting frequency, hangout locations, leadership, substance use, sexual talk, territory, criminal involvement, fights, and reactions when someone leaves. Together, these themes examine prosocial orientation and whether leisure is accompanied by pressure, conflict, or antisocial conduct.
A reader can use this street peer group questionnaire to organize observations about a current or remembered circle. The result describes the pattern represented by the answers, not a permanent label for every member.
The displayed Total Score scale runs from 12 to 60 and uses these bands:
- Antisocial orientation (12-17) indicates a pronounced antisocial pattern within the group.
- Mostly entertainment/idleness (18-42) describes a group focused on recreation and passing time without clear demands or pressure.
- Typical peer group (43-60) indicates ordinary interaction and varied interests beyond the group.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item offers three response choices, usually contrasting higher-risk, intermediate, and lower-risk descriptions. The respondent selects the option that best matches the group. The questionnaire reports a Total Score from 12 to 60, but its response weights and calculation rule are not documented; follow the displayed bands rather than reverse-engineering scoring.
Conceptually, the content is consistent with Dodge and Dishion’s Your Street Crew questionnaire. Read the displayed bands as descriptions of the group pattern represented by selected answers, not separate labels for every member.
Dishion, Patterson, Stoolmiller, and Skinner (1991) provide related evidence on peer group behavior and antisocial-peer pathways, while Dishion, McCord, and Poulin (1999) examine peer-group processes that can amplify problem behavior; neither study validates this questionnaire.
Interpret the result as a snapshot of the group as perceived by one respondent. Current conflict, memory, social desirability, or limited knowledge of other members’ behavior can influence answers. No population norms, reliability estimates, or clinical cutoffs are stated for this questionnaire, so the score organizes self-reflection rather than establishing a diagnosis.
- Sokolov, Ya. V., D. V. Kolesov, S. V. Maksimov, et al. (2003). Civic Education: Grade 6: Textbook for Students, Their Parents, and Teachers. 9th ed. Moscow: Grazhdanin. 157 pp. ISBN 5-88433-009-X.
- Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. L. (1991). Family, School, and Behavioral Antecedents to Early Adolescent Involvement with Antisocial Peers. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 172-180. 10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.172
- Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When Interventions Harm: Peer Groups and Problem Behavior. American Psychologist, 54(9), 755-764. 10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.755
Updated: