Addictive Tendency Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Addictive Tendency Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine their relationship with stimulation, substance-related situations, or difficulty stopping certain habits may find this assessment of addictive tendencies useful. The Addictive Tendency Scale Test asks about beliefs, urges, social settings, and consequences related to alcohol, tobacco, other psychoactive substances, and pleasure seeking. It offers a structured way to consider how these situations fit into a person's own experience.
What This Assessment Explores
Items cover sensation seeking, substance-related beliefs, drinking, smoking, urges, loss of control, social influence, consequences, withdrawal-like experiences, and change efforts. Themes show how addictive patterns affect self-management.
The five displayed dimensions are:
- Addictive Disorder (0-6) assesses impairment linked with addictive behavior; Low 0-2.1 and Elevated 2.2-6 are the displayed bands.
- Addictive Behavior (0-7) reflects behavioral manifestations of addiction; Low 0-4.1 and Elevated 4.2-7 are shown.
- Addictive Tendency (0-9) indicates propensity toward stimulation seeking and future addictive behavior; Low 0-4.3 and Elevated 4.4-9 apply.
- Addictive Predisposition (0-8) captures personality and psychological factors associated with vulnerability; Low 0-3.7 and Elevated 3.8-8 are displayed.
- General Addictive Tendency (0-30) summarizes overall predisposition; Low 0-13 and Elevated 14-30 are the result bands.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each question uses a yes-or-no response, so this addictive behavior questionnaire is a brief self-report rather than an interview or performance measure. Results show separate scale scores plus an overall score; higher values indicate more of the tendency or impairment that each scale describes. An answer’s contribution cannot be inferred from the displayed range alone.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Addictive Tendency Questionnaire described by Yusupov and Korzunin (2007), while its wording and online scoring should not be presented as a verified adaptation. Jellinek’s framework contextualizes impairment and progression in alcohol-related problems, while Marlatt and George’s relapse-prevention model draws attention to triggers, coping, and recurrence.
Interpretation is therefore profile-based: an elevated area can identify a theme for reflection, while a low score does not rule out harm or guarantee stability. This online questionnaire has no documented standardization or population norms; its displayed bands describe the catalogue’s profile rather than established clinical thresholds. Current circumstances, memory, self-awareness, and response style can influence the profile, which should be read as a starting point for broader assessment rather than a diagnosis.
- Yusupov, V. V., and V. A. Korzunin. Psychological Diagnostics of Addictive Behavior: Risk of Development, Methods of Early Detection. Saint Petersburg: Rech, 2007. 123 pp. ISBN 5-9268-0576-7.
- Jellinek, E. M. The Disease Concept of Alcoholism. New Haven, CT: Hillhouse Press, 1960. 246 pp.
- Marlatt, G. Alan, and William H. George. Relapse Prevention: Introduction and Overview of the Model. British Journal of Addiction 79, no. 4 (1984): 261-273. DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1984.tb03867.x
Updated: