Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all true
- Probably not true
- Probably true
- True
- Completely true
- Not at all true
- Probably not true
- Probably true
- True
- Completely true
- Not at all true
- Probably not true
- Probably true
- True
- Completely true
Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test
Readers who want to understand a sibling bond beyond a simple sense of getting along can use the Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test to examine recurring interaction patterns. It is suited to one person’s view of a relationship that may include warmth, rivalry, distance, influence, or boundary strain. A sibling relationship questionnaire organizes these impressions into a profile for focused reflection.
What This Assessment Explores
These items cover closeness, emotional responsiveness, shared interests, arguments, imitation, influence, fairness, and respect for space.
- Coercion (1-5) reflects power and control, dominance, exploitation, and isolation; bands: Low coercion 1-2.3, Moderate coercion 2.4-3.6, High coercion 3.7-5.
- Similarity (1-5) reflects shared interests, life experiences, and emotional experiences; bands: Low similarity 1-2.4, Moderate similarity 2.5-3.4, High similarity 3.5-5.
- Boundary Maintenance (1-5) reflects respect for physical and psychological space; bands: Low boundary respect 1-2.4, Moderate boundary respect 2.5-3.7, High boundary respect 3.8-5.
- Empathy (1-5) reflects care, interest, emotional closeness, and shared time; bands: Low empathy 1-2.4, Moderate empathy 2.5-3.6, High empathy 3.7-5.
As a sibling relationship test, the profile highlights connection alongside control, distance, or boundary strain for targeted reflection.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses a five-point agreement scale, from not at all true to completely true, although middle labels vary. The prompts mix observable behavior with perception, so responses reflect the respondent’s current view. Scores are grouped by dimension and read through the displayed bands, producing a separate result for each area.
The questionnaire is an online version of Dunn and Plomin’s Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ), not an adaptation of Graham-Bermann and Cutler’s differently named Brother-Sister Questionnaire. Its displayed bands describe this version’s profile and should not be read as a scoring system from that separate instrument.
Dunn and Plomin’s work on sibling differences indicates that siblings may experience family life differently, so this result represents one person’s account of the relationship rather than a shared account.
The profile can serve as a sibling dynamics assessment, focusing reflection on specific interactions and possible change points. Self-report is sensitive to current mood, memory, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose; results describe one perspective at one time and do not establish a diagnosis.
- Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Cutler, S. E. (1994). The Brother-Sister Questionnaire: Psychometric Assessment and Discrimination of Well-Functioning From Dysfunctional Relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(2), 224-238. 10.1037/0893-3200.8.2.224
- Graham-Bermann, S. A., Cutler, S. E., Litzenberger, B. W., & Schwartz, W. E. (1994). Perceived Conflict and Violence in Childhood Sibling Relationships and Later Emotional Adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(1), 85-97. 10.1037/0893-3200.8.1.85
- Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1991). Why Are Siblings So Different? The Significance of Differences in Sibling Experiences Within the Family. Family Process, 30(3), 271-283. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1991.00271.x
Updated: