Home1
Psychological tests2
Personal Psychological Safety Assessment3

Personal Psychological Safety Assessment Test

With 88 questions, the Personal Psychological Safety Assessment Test takes about 17 minutes to complete. It explores inner comfort, personal meaning, resilience, planning, and communication. Your profile can highlight current strengths and areas for reflection, helping you understand how you respond to stress and relationships.

Questions: 8817 minutes

Personal Psychological Safety Assessment: test ticket with numbers

October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published

28,758 views

2,591 completion

2,140 likes

Daniel Hall Psychologist · Test reviewer

2,140 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Internal ComfortIC

Measures perceived inner well-being, self-confidence, and the degree of calm versus anxiety.

example score6/132

6/132Low comfortexample score

0 – 74Low comfort

75 – 132High comfort

A score of 6 falls in the Low comfort range, indicating limited inner ease and self-confidence with a higher likelihood of tension or worry.

Value and MeaningVaM

Measures the degree to which a person experiences life as meaningful and can draw on inner values and meanings as psychological resources in difficult situations.

example score96/138

96/138Stronger resourcesexample score

0 – 79Lower resources

80 – 138Stronger resources

A score of 96 falls in the Stronger resources range, suggesting a relatively well-formed sense of meaning and access to internal resources that can support steadiness under stress.

Motivational-Volitional ScaleMVS

Assesses resilience, goal-directed motivation, and volitional self-regulation through planning and adaptive action under stress.

example score91/138

91/138Higherexample score

0 – 81Lower

82 – 138Higher

A score of 91 falls in the Higher range, suggesting generally strong goal-setting, planning, and adaptive persistence in challenging conditions.

Moral-CommunicativeMC

Measures how effectively a person relies on moral principles and communication norms to maintain comfortable, psychologically safe relationships in a group.

example score95/120

95/120Higherexample score

0 – 69Lower

70 – 120Higher

A score of 95 falls in the Higher range, suggesting generally flexible, open, and tolerant interpersonal behavior that supports psychological safety within a team.

Psychological Safety IndexPSI

Measures overall psychological protection and resilience to stressors based on internal state and interpersonal functioning.

example score250/528

250/528Lower safetyexample score

0 – 308Lower safety

309 – 528Higher safety

A score of 250 falls in the Lower safety range, suggesting comparatively less robust adaptation resources and greater sensitivity to sustained stress in challenging conditions.

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Military and law enforcement

41%OF USERS

People in high-risk duty roles take it to gauge inner security, spot stress vulnerabilities, and reduce burnout after intense or unstable situations.

Emergency and crisis responders

34%OF USERS

Paramedics, firefighters, and rescue workers use it to understand how their beliefs and coping style affect calmness and resilience under pressure.

HR and psychological support

25%OF USERS

Recruiters and psychologists in high-stress organizations use it for selection and targeted support by identifying potential conflicts and needed adjustments.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Shaded area — where most people score

Dot — the average

You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test

Scale 4. Inner ComfortS4IC

You?

Average67.8

Typical rangeTypical51.7 – 83.9

Possible0 – 132

Scale 3. Value-SemanticS3V

You?

Average46.7

Typical rangeTypical27.4 – 66

Possible0 – 138

Scale 2. Motivational and VolitionalS2MaV

You?

Average39

Typical rangeTypical21.3 – 56.7

Possible0 – 138

Scale 1. Moral-CommunicativeS1M

You?

Average64.2

Typical rangeTypical41.9 – 86.4

Possible0 – 120

Psychological Safety IndexPSI

You?

Average211.8

Typical rangeTypical140.2 – 283.4

Possible0 – 528

Featured On

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

This questionnaire contains statements to be evaluated in relation to your way of life, including your experiences, thoughts, habits, behavioral style, and patterns of relationships with others. For each statement, select the response option that most accurately applies.

- This definitely describes me
- This is like me
- This is like me, but I am not sure
- I am not sure this applies to me
- I doubt this applies to me
- This is usually not characteristic of me
- This does not apply to me at all
- This is definitely true of me
- This is like me
- This seems like me, but I am not sure
- I hesitate to say this applies to me
- I doubt this applies to me
- This is not characteristic of me in most cases
- This does not apply to me at all
- This is definitely true of me
- This is like me
- This is somewhat like me, but I am not sure
- I do not feel comfortable describing myself this way
- I doubt that this applies to me
- This is not true of me in most cases
- This does not apply to me at all

These are 3 of the 88 real questions — the rest appear in the test. No sign-up needed to start.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Personal Psychological Safety Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test

security

instability

occupational psychology

resilience

For people reflecting on how they cope with pressure, relationships, and uncertainty, the Personal Psychological Safety Assessment Test offers a structured profile rather than a single label. It can function as a psychological safety profile by showing how inner confidence, meaning, persistence, flexibility, and interpersonal conduct may support or weaken a sense of safety in demanding situations. The result is most useful for focused self-reflection.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire examines anxiety, self-doubt, persistence, planning, adaptation, and interpersonal conduct, giving a profile of stability under pressure.

Taken together, this personal psychological safety test shows how these areas may interact in a person's experience of security and coping.

Its five displayed dimensions are:

Internal Comfort (0-132) measures well-being, confidence, and low anxiety; Low comfort is 0-74, and High comfort is 75-132.
Value and Meaning (0-138) measures life meaning and inner coping resources; Lower resources is 0-79, and Stronger resources is 80-138.
Motivational-Volitional Scale (0-138) measures resilience, goals, planning, and adaptation; Lower is 0-81, and Higher is 82-138.
Moral-Communicative (0-120) measures the capacity to apply moral and communication norms for comfortable relationships, including flexibility, openness, and tolerance; Lower is 0-69, and Higher is 70-120.
Psychological Safety Index (0-528) measures protection from adverse psychological influences and stress; Lower safety is 0-308, and Higher safety is 309-528.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item is a self-description rated on seven points, from very close fit to no fit. The sample covers confidence, worry, setbacks, decisions, relationships, and conduct toward others. Choose your usual pattern rather than an ideal self-image.

Responses become the displayed dimension scores and overall index. The ranges and bands do not show how responses contribute or provide a calculation formula.

Methodologically, this structured self-report profile is neither an interview nor a performance task. As a psychological resilience assessment, it organizes reflection around coping, flexibility, and interpersonal functioning. Its closest conceptual reference is Diagnosis of Personal Psychological Safety (Prikhodko, 2013), but the online questionnaire is not identical to that instrument and does not automatically inherit its evidence.

Litvinova and colleagues (2021) and Kharlamenkova and colleagues (2017) provide reference points for its emphasis on internal resources, adversity, and interpersonal conditions. The self-ratings cover confidence, worry, decisions, persistence, adaptation, and relationships, without presenting this version as an adaptation or validation. Stress, self-awareness, and response style can shape self-report; read the profile as a starting point for reflection rather than a diagnosis.

Author: Edwin A. Locke

Literature:

Prikhodko, I.I. (2013). Development of Psychodiagnostic Tools for Determining the Psychological Safety of the Personality of Specialists in Extreme Activities. Vestnik Universiteta (Bulletin of the University), no. 11, pp. 242-253.
Litvinova, A.V., Koteneva, A.V., Kokurin, A.V., and Ivanov, V.S. (2021). Problems of Psychological Safety of a Person in Extreme Conditions of Life. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 10(1), 8-16. 10.17759/jmfp.2021100101
Kharlamenkova, N.E., Tarabrina, N.V., Bykhovets, Y.V., Vorona, O.A., Kazymova, N.N., Dymova, E.N., and Shatalova, N.E. (2017). Psychological Safety of the Individual: Implicit and Explicit Concepts. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 263 pp.

Updated: 2025-10-02