Addiction Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- Sometimes
- Extremely rarely
- No
- Yes
- Sometimes
- Extremely rarely
- No
- Yes
- Sometimes
- Extremely rarely
- No
Addiction Test - Description and methodology of the test
People questioning whether a recurring substance or activity pattern is becoming disruptive can use this addictive personality test to organize self-reflection. This addiction test helps decide which patterns merit closer attention and what to monitor or discuss next. Its profile highlights the most prominent areas, giving reflection a clearer starting point.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions address compulsive patterns. Used as an am i an addict quiz, the profile helps someone reflect on behavioral dependence; it describes patterns, not identity.
Results cover:
- Abrupt Lifestyle Changes (0-15) measures abrupt change and impaired stability: Low 0-5; Elevated 6-15.
- Denial of Addiction (0-12) measures denial: Low denial 0-5; Moderate denial 6-6; High denial 7-12.
- Use Despite Negative Consequences (0-15) measures persistence despite harm: Low 0-5; Elevated 6-15.
- Failed Attempts to Abstain (0-12) measures failed abstinence: Low 0-5; Moderate 6-12.
- Loss of Control (0-15) measures difficulty stopping behavior: Low 0-5; Elevated 6-15.
- Withdrawal Syndrome (0-15) measures withdrawal symptoms after stopping: Low 0-5; Moderate 6-15. Tolerance Change (0-12) measures habituation and increased use: Low 0-5; Moderate 6-6; High 7-12.
- Addictive Behavior Level (0-96) measures dependent-behavior severity: Low 0-30; Moderate 31-50; Elevated 51-96.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
In the sampled items, respondents choose Yes, Sometimes, Very rarely, Extremely rarely, or No; the two rarity labels are distinct. Responses are combined into domain and overall results. The questionnaire does not specify each response's point value, so answer order alone cannot establish the calculation.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Telepova's Integrated Addictive Behavior Test (2015), not presented as its adaptation. Related work by Telepova and Telepov (2018) addresses adherence to addictive behavior.
Marlatt and George's (1984) relapse-prevention model, expanded by Marlatt and Donovan (2005), offers an interpretive lens for urges, high-risk situations, consequences, coping, and recurrence. It does not establish this questionnaire's item design. Viewed as an addiction quiz, the questionnaire links these experiences with efforts to regain control.
Because the items also cover non-substance patterns, this assessment is broader than a substance-focused measure. For this online version, displayed bands are descriptive, without established population norms or independently reported standardization; mood, memory, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose can affect the self-report profile.
- Telepova, N. N. (2015). Diagnostics of Addictive Behavior: Integrated Test. Bulletin of Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 1(31), 47-58.
- Telepova, N. N., & Telepov, M. N. (2018). Diagnostics of Adherence to Addictive Behavior Degree: Integrated Test. Samara: Publishing House of the Samara Branch of Moscow City Pedagogical University, 28 pp.
- Marlatt, G. Alan, & Donovan, Dennis M. (Eds.). (2005). Relapse Prevention: Maintenance Strategies in the Treatment of Addictive Behaviors (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Marlatt, G. Alan, & George, William H. (1984). Relapse Prevention: Introduction and Overview of the Model. British Journal of Addiction, 79(4), 261-273. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1984.tb03867.x
Updated: