Assessment of School Motivation Type in High School Students Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Assessment of School Motivation Type in High School Students Test - Description and methodology of the test
Students and adults supporting them who want to understand what gives schoolwork meaning may find the Assessment of School Motivation Type in High School Students Test useful. This school motivation assessment examines achievement, approval, peer context, family expectations, fear of criticism, future usefulness, and interest in knowledge. The result organizes reflection around influences noticeable in a learner’s approach.
What This Assessment Explores
Motivation varies; a high school motivation test shows influences.
All scales: 0-3. Bands: A=Low 0-1/High 2-3; B=Low prestige 0-1/High prestige 2-3; C=Low influence 0-0/Moderate influence 1-2/High influence 3-3; D=Low influence 0-1/High influence 2-3; E=Low family influence 0-1/High family influence 2-3; F=Low 0-1/Moderate 2-2/High 3-3.
- Context shapes motivation: Prestige of Academic Achievement in the Family; Academic Achievement Prestige in the Class; School Influence; Family Influence (A/B/D/E).
- Learning motives show growth: Self-Realization Motive; Extracurricular School Motivation; Awareness of Social Necessity; Cognitive Interest (A/A/F/F).
- Social motives add pressure: Peer Influence; Social Interaction Motive; Fear of Negative Evaluation by Family; Fear of Negative Evaluation by School Staff; Fear of Punishment (C/F/F/A/A).
- Recognition motives show approval: Approval Motive (Parents); Teacher Approval Motive; Peer Approval Motive; Social Approval Motive; Achievement Motivation (A/A/A/F/F).
Methodology and Evidence Base
Responses are binary Yes/No self-reports, while the result screen presents separate 0-3 values and the stated bands for each scale. Because no item-level allocation is specified, the number of points assigned to a Yes or No answer and any overall total should not be inferred. As a student motivation assessment, it is best read as a pattern across dimensions rather than a single rank.
The structure is conceptually consistent with School Motivation Type Diagnostic (Lepesheva, 2007), the closest subject match. Bazaleva and Shashkov’s 2019 study and Nikulina and Snezhkova’s 2019 study provide context for viewing educational motivation through social surroundings, future aims, achievement, and learning activity. They do not establish norms for this online questionnaire or prove that it is a validated version of those works.
Self-report results may shift with current school experiences, family relationships, honesty, and self-awareness. The displayed bands are descriptive categories, not clinical cutoffs or population norms, so one profile cannot explain motivation in every setting.
- Lepesheva, Evgenia. (2007). Methodology for Diagnosing the Type of School Motivation in High School Students. School Psychologist, No. 9 (391), pp. 20-24.
- Bazaleva, Lyubov A., and Shashkov, Alexander V. (2019). Features of the Educational Motivation of Adolescents Involved in Various Youth Subcultures. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 7(6), Article 50PSMN619.
- Nikulina, Irina V., and Snezhkova, Alisa E. (2019). Study of the Level of Formation of Motivation for Learning Activities of Students. Vestnik of Samara University: History, Pedagogy, Philology, 25(3), pp. 89-94. 10.18287/2542-0445-2019-25-3-89-94.
Updated: