Detailed Infantility Test (DIT)

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Symptom is present
- Symptom is partially present
- Symptom is absent
- Symptom is present
- Symptom is partially present
- Symptom is absent
- Symptom is present
- Symptom is partially present
- Symptom is absent
Detailed Infantility Test (DIT) - Description and methodology of the test
Readers who question their level of self-direction or their response to ordinary demands may use the Detailed Infantility Test (DIT) to examine whether these concerns form a broader pattern. The result offers a concise starting point for identifying situations that deserve closer attention rather than treating any single difficulty as definitive. By turning observations from different situations into an infantility assessment, the test gives the reader a consistent profile to consider.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire examines a pattern of functioning rather than one isolated complaint. Its items address judgment, accountability, independence, adaptation, emotional maturity, and responses to other people. The focus suits readers reflecting on decisions, tasks, group situations, and relationships.
The main thematic groups are:
- Judgment and reality testing show how factors are weighed and conclusions are revised.
- Responsibility, planning, and persistence show how consequences, time, effort, and tasks are handled.
- Independence, social response, and emotion show patterns of support-seeking, empathy, anxiety, rigidity, and response to direction.
One displayed scale yields one construct profile. Infantility (0-53) measures the severity of infantile personality traits and supports differential assessment of infantilism. The bands are Within normative range 0-8, Borderline 9-17, and Infantilism (mild to pronounced) 18-53; within that last band, 18-26 is Grade I, 27-35 Grade II, and 36 or higher is pronounced.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses three response choices: symptom present, symptom partially present, or symptom absent. The wording describes patterns in thinking, behavior, emotion, and everyday functioning, so the respondent judges applicability rather than selecting a frequency or intensity level. As a self-reflection questionnaire, it uses a structured, symptom-oriented self-report approach.
The result is presented as a single scale outcome. The questionnaire does not state how each response contributes to the total, so read the score through the stated bands rather than an invented conversion formula.
Detailed Infantilism Test (Datskovsky, 2018) is the closest published reference for the construct and item themes. The related DIT-M work by Datskovsky (2019) offers a modified comparison point, while Abdrakhimova (2016) provides historical context for the term infantilism. The online form is an infantility questionnaire conceptually consistent with Datskovsky's DIT but not documented as an adaptation or independently validated standardized edition; its result label does not by itself provide normative data or a documented standardized scoring method.
Current mood, self-awareness, and impression management can shift responses; read the score as a reflective profile rather than a diagnosis.
- Datskovsky, Israel. “Detailed Infantilism Test - DIT.” Humanities Scientific Researches, no. 12 (88), 2018.
- Datskovsky, Israel. “Modified Detailed Infantilism Test - DIT-M.” East European Scientific Journal, no. 7(47), 2019, pp. 40-48.
- Abdrakhimova, R. G. “Historical Aspects of the Emergence of the Term ‘Infantilism.’” International Research Journal, no. 3 (45), 2016, pp. 6-10. 10.18454/IRJ.2016.45.068.
Updated: