Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
family

Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test

Take the online Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for self-reflection, the Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test contains 35 questions and takes about 7 minutes. It explores patterns of coercion, similarity, boundary maintenance, and empathy between siblings, helping you consider closeness, independence, mutual care, and areas where greater understanding may be useful.
Questions: 357 minutes
Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
25,429 views
2,705 completions
2,142 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,142 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

CoercionC
Measures the degree of dominance, control, and exploitation one sibling uses over another in the relationship.
example score3/5
3/5Moderate coercionexample score
1 – 2.3Low coercion
2.4 – 3.6Moderate coercion
3.7 – 5High coercion
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of coercion, suggesting some control or dominance behaviors are present but not strongly pervasive.
SimilarityS
Measures how much siblings share interests, experiences, and feelings versus how distinct they perceive themselves to be.
example score4/5
4/5High similarityexample score
1 – 2.4Low similarity
2.5 – 3.6Moderate similarity
3.7 – 5High similarity
A score of 4 indicates high perceived similarity, suggesting notable shared interests or experiences and a sense of common ground between siblings.
Boundary MaintenanceBM
Assesses how well siblings respect each other’s physical and psychological boundaries, including possessions and personal interests.
example score2/5
2/5Low boundary respectexample score
1 – 2.3Low boundary respect
2.4 – 3.6Moderate boundary respect
3.7 – 5High boundary respect
A score of 2 indicates low boundary respect, suggesting boundaries around space, belongings, or personal interests are often not maintained between siblings.
EmpathyE
Measures the degree of caring, emotional understanding, and connection between siblings.
example score3/5
3/5Moderate empathyexample score
1 – 2.4Low empathy
2.5 – 3.6Moderate empathy
3.7 – 5High empathy
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of empathy, suggesting some caring and emotional attunement alongside areas where understanding and shared support may be inconsistent.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Parents of quarreling kids
44%OF USERS
Parents take it to understand how often siblings fight, what triggers aggression, and what might help restore calmer relationships at home.
Family therapists and counselors
31%OF USERS
Clinicians use it as a quick screening tool to gauge sibling conflict patterns and guide family sessions or intervention plans.
Researchers and school psychologists
25%OF USERS
Professionals in education or research administer it to track sibling relationship quality and evaluate outcomes of programs or studies.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
CoercionC
You?
Average3.5
Typical rangeTypical2.9 – 4.1
Possible1 – 5
SimilarityS
You?
Average3.6
Typical rangeTypical2.9 – 4.2
Possible1 – 5
Setting BoundariesSB
You?
Average3.8
Typical rangeTypical3.3 – 4.4
Possible1 – 5
EmpathyE
You?
Average3.8
Typical rangeTypical3.2 – 4.3
Possible1 – 5
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Not at all true
    • Probably untrue
    • Probably true
    • True
    • Completely true
    • Not at all true
    • Probably not true
    • Probably true
    • True
    • Completely true
    • Not at all true
    • Probably not true
    • Probably true
    • True
    • Completely true
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test

family
siblings

For readers trying to understand a changing or complicated sibling bond, the Sibling Questionnaire (BSQ) Test offers a structured way to examine how closeness, independence, conflict, and mutual care appear in everyday interactions. As a sibling relationship assessment, it can help a respondent organize impressions of the relationship and identify patterns worth discussing, without reducing a complex family connection to one overall label.

What This Assessment Explores

It separates connection from conflict. The sibling relationship questionnaire examines closeness, independence, conflict, and care; results describe tendencies, not fixed identities.

The dimensions are:

  • Coercion (1-5) reflects dominance, control, or exploitation; Low coercion 1-2.3; Moderate coercion 2.4-3.6; High coercion 3.7-5.
  • Similarity (1-5) reflects shared interests, life, and emotional experiences; higher scores indicate similarity; lower scores suggest differentiation or deidentification; Low similarity 1-2.4; Moderate similarity 2.5-3.6; High similarity 3.7-5.
  • Boundary Maintenance (1-5) reflects respect for material boundaries and siblings’ physical and psychological space; Low boundary respect 1-2.3; Moderate boundary respect 2.4-3.6; High boundary respect 3.7-5.
  • Empathy (1-5) reflects care, interest, attachment, and shared time; Low empathy 1-2.4; Moderate empathy 2.5-3.6; High empathy 3.7-5.

Methodology and Evidence Base

The questionnaire uses brief self-report statements about friendship, shared activities, emotion, conflict, imitation, possessions, chores, encouragement, and exclusion. Responses use five truth options from not at all true to completely true, so the respondent rates the relationship rather than recounting one event.

Answers are organized into four displayed dimensions. The result forms a profile across the four dimensions rather than a single total. The questionnaire does not specify how individual answers are weighted or reverse-coded, so its item-level scoring cannot be reconstructed from the response labels. Taken together, the assessment of sibling dynamics is best read as a pattern across dimensions and examples.

The framework is conceptually consistent with the Brother-Sister Questionnaire (BSQ; Graham-Bermann & Cutler, 1994), a published measure of sibling relationship functioning. Relva et al. (2017) examined its construct validity in Portuguese adolescents, but that evidence does not automatically validate this online version. Its digital standardization is not established by those studies. Results may shift with current conflict, memory, self-awareness, or a wish to present the relationship favorably, so they are a starting point for reflection.

Author: J. Dunn
Literature:
  • Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Cutler, S. E. (1994). The Brother-Sister Questionnaire: Psychometric Assessment and Discrimination of Well-Functioning From Dysfunctional Relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(2), 224-238. 10.1037/0893-3200.8.2.224
  • Relva, I. C., Fernandes, O. M., Alarcão, M., Graham-Bermann, S., & Lopes, P. (2017). Psychometric Proprieties and Construct Validity of the Brother-Sister Questionnaire in a Sample of Portuguese Adolescents. Journal of Family Violence, 32(3), 333-340. 10.1007/s10896-016-9851-x

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment