Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale (DACOBS) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Completely agree
- Agree
- Somewhat agree
- Not sure
- Somewhat disagree
- Disagree
- Completely disagree
- Completely agree
- Agree
- Rather agree
- Don't know
- Rather disagree
- Disagree
- Completely disagree
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Somewhat agree
- Don't know
- Somewhat disagree
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale (DACOBS) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine how they notice danger, interpret other people, explain events, or revise beliefs can use this profile to organize self-reflection. The Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale (DACOBS) Test is intended for readers interested in recurring cognitive patterns rather than a broad personality description. A cognitive biases test can show which tendencies deserve closer attention in everyday judgments and decisions.
What This Assessment Explores
Across the items, the DACOBS questionnaire examines attention to threat, avoidance, social interpretation, explanations for events, belief revision, and rapid conclusions. Results describe the strength of these tendencies, not a single cause. The dimensions are:
- Avoidance Behavior (0–7) measures situational avoidance; Thought Problems (0–7) measures attention, memory, and reasoning difficulty. Both: Low 0–2, Moderate 3–5, High 6–7.
- Difficulties Understanding Others (0–7) measures social-meaning difficulty; External Attribution (0–7) measures outward explanations. Both: Low 0–2, Moderate 3–5, High 6–7.
- Attention to Threat (0–7) measures danger focus; Belief Inflexibility (0–7) measures resistance to evidence. Attention: Low 0–2, Moderate 3–5, High 6–7; Belief: Low rigidity 0–2, Moderate rigidity 3–5, High rigidity 6–7.
- Jumping to Conclusions (0–7) measures limited-evidence inference; Total Score (0–7) summarizes overall cognitive-bias level. Both: Low 0–2, Moderate 3–4, High 5–7.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
First-person statements ask respondents to rate agreement on seven ordered options, from complete agreement to complete disagreement, with an uncertainty choice in the middle. This format captures perceived experiences and habits rather than performance on an objective task.
As an online cognitive bias questionnaire, it reports dimension scores and a total profile. Its scoring display gives ranges and result bands, but it does not state how each response is converted into points; the bands therefore should not be used to reverse-engineer a formula.
The research anchor is DACOBS (van der Gaag et al., 2013), a published factor-based instrument organized around seven cognitive-bias factors. Bastiaens et al. (2013) examined its structure, internal consistency, discriminative power, and convergent validity in psychotic patients and healthy controls. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, not a separately documented adaptation, so those findings do not establish identical norms for this online version.
Because answers are self-reported, current stress, self-awareness, and response style can influence results. Read the profile as a descriptive aid for reflection, not as a diagnosis.
- van der Gaag, M., Schutz, C., Ten Napel, A., Landa, Y., Delespaul, P., Bak, M., Tschacher, W., & de Hert, M. (2013). Development of the Davos assessment of cognitive biases scale (DACOBS). Schizophrenia Research, 144(1-3), 63-71. 10.1016/j.schres.2012.12.010
- Bastiaens, T., Claes, L., Smits, D., De Wachter, D., van der Gaag, M., & De Hert, M. (2013). The Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis (CBQ-P) and the Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases (DACOBS): validation in a Flemish sample of psychotic patients and healthy controls. Schizophrenia Research, 147(2-3), 310-314. 10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.037
Updated: