Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
subjectivity

Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale (FAD-Plus) Test

Take the online Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale (FAD-Plus) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale (FAD-Plus) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 27 questions and a completion time of about 5 minutes, this Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale (FAD-Plus) Test explores beliefs about choice, fate, scientific causes, and uncertainty, giving respondents a concise profile for self-reflection on personal agency, responsibility, and life events.
Questions: 275 minutes
Free Will and Determinism Plus: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
31,292 views
2,798 completions
2,314 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,314 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Scientific DeterminismSD
Measures the extent to which a person believes that human actions are determined by scientific laws and causal factors rather than free choice.
example score3/5
3/5Moderateexample score
1 – 2.3Low
2.4 – 3.6Moderate
3.7 – 5High
A score of 3 indicates a moderate belief in scientific determinism, suggesting a balanced tendency to attribute behavior to causal factors without fully dismissing personal agency.
UnpredictabilityU
Measures the extent to which a person views life events and outcomes as inherently unpredictable and difficult to understand or anticipate.
example score3/5
3/5Mixed/neutralexample score
1 – 2.4More predictable worldview
2.5 – 3.5Mixed/neutral
3.6 – 5More unpredictable worldview
A score of 3 indicates a moderate belief in unpredictability, suggesting a balanced view where the world is sometimes seen as hard to foresee but not consistently chaotic.
Fatalistic DeterminismFD
Measures the extent to which a person believes life events and personal outcomes are governed by fate or inevitable forces beyond individual control.
example score3/5
3/5Moderateexample score
1 – 2.4Low
2.5 – 3.5Moderate
3.6 – 5High
A score of 3 indicates a moderate tendency to view outcomes as partly shaped by fate, alongside some room for personal influence.
Free WillFW
Measures the extent to which a person believes human choices are genuinely free and meaningful.
example score4/5
4/5Highexample score
1 – 2.4Low
2.5 – 3.4Moderate
3.5 – 5High
A score of 4 indicates a high endorsement of human freedom, suggesting you tend to view personal choices as real and impactful.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Self-improvement seekers
41%OF USERS
They want to understand how much they see their life as driven by personal choice versus circumstances to improve motivation, habits, and accountability.
Students of psychology
34%OF USERS
They take it for coursework or projects to explore how beliefs about free will and determinism relate to behavior, responsibility, and moral judgments.
Counseling and coaching clients
25%OF USERS
They use it to clarify whether they feel in control or constrained, helping shape realistic goals and strategies for change.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Scientific determinismSd
You?
Average3.2
Typical rangeTypical2.7 – 3.8
Possible1 – 5
UnpredictabilityU
You?
Average4
Typical rangeTypical3.3 – 4.6
Possible1 – 5
Fatalistic DeterminismFD
You?
Average3.6
Typical rangeTypical2.9 – 4.3
Possible1 – 5
FreedomF
You?
Average2.1
Typical rangeTypical1.4 – 2.8
Possible1 – 5
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale (FAD-Plus) Test - Description and methodology of the test

subjectivity
beliefs

For readers who want to examine how they explain choice, responsibility, and events outside personal control, the Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale (FAD-Plus) Test offers a structured profile of those beliefs. This free will and determinism questionnaire can support self-reflection about agency, fate, biological influence, and uncertainty without reducing a complex worldview to one overall label.

What This Assessment Explores

Items examine beliefs about choice, fate, biology, upbringing, chance, predictability, and responsibility. FAD-Plus scale covers four viewpoints:

  • Scientific Determinism (1–5) measures beliefs in scientific causes, linked to reduced activity, goal-directedness, and optimism; Low 1–2.3; Moderate 2.4–3.6; High 3.7–5.
  • Unpredictability (1–5) measures belief in an unpredictable world, linked to reduced analysis, positive affect, and meaning; More predictable worldview 1–2.4; Mixed/neutral 2.5–3.5; More unpredictable worldview 3.6–5.
  • Fatalistic Determinism (1–5) measures fatalistic beliefs, linked to reduced agency and mindfulness with harmony and life satisfaction; Low 1–2.4; Moderate 2.5–3.5; High 3.6–5.
  • Free Will (1–5) measures free-will beliefs, linked to well-being, optimism, responsibility, meaning, and resources; Low 1–2.4; Moderate 2.5–3.4; High 3.5–5.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement uses five-point agreement options from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. Items cover control, responsibility, biological and environmental influence, fate, luck, and predictability. The profile gives four separate results; no standardized calculation rule is stated.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the published FAD-Plus (Paulhus & Carey, 2011), a measure of lay beliefs about free will and related constructs. Fino and Iliceto (2023) provide psychometric evidence from the Italian FAD-Plus-I, but the cited studies do not establish that this online version has the published instruments’ reliability or norms, or that it is a validated adaptation.

Read the profile across scales rather than treating one result as decisive: scientific explanations can coexist with responsibility, and uncertainty can coexist with agency. No population norms are stated for this online questionnaire, so the displayed bands should be read as descriptive labels.

Because this free will test relies on self-report and abstract statements, scores may reflect response style, current context, or enduring beliefs. Use the result for structured reflection rather than as a standalone measure of personality, mental health, or actual freedom of action.

Author: Kathleen D. Vohs, Roy F. Baumeister
Literature:
  • Paulhus, D. L., & Carey, J. M. (2011). The FAD-Plus: Measuring lay beliefs regarding free will and related constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 96–104. 10.1080/00223891.2010.528483
  • Fino, E., & Iliceto, P. (2023). Do people have control over the decisions they make? Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the free will and scientific determinism questionnaire (FAD-Plus-I). Current Psychology, 42, 11268–11286. 10.1007/s12144-021-02268-4

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment