Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all true
- Somewhat true
- Moderately true
- Completely true
- Does not fit at all
- Fits somewhat
- Fits moderately well
- Fits very well
- Not at all so
- Somewhat so
- Moderately so
- Exactly so
Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) Test - Description and methodology of the test
For athletes, coaches, and people preparing for an evaluated performance, this assessment offers a structured way to examine how pressure is experienced before competition. The Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2) Test can help a respondent distinguish bodily activation, performance-related thinking, and psychological readiness in relation to a particular event. A competitive anxiety test is most useful when answers refer to the situation immediately in mind.
What This Assessment Explores
The items focus on immediate pre-competition experience rather than broad personality. They ask about nervousness, tension, racing heart, sweating, stomach discomfort, self-doubt, fear of poor performance, concentration, confidence, relaxation, security, and coping with pressure. The questionnaire suits training, selection, matches, races, auditions, and other settings where performance is evaluated.
The result separates three dimensions. The CSAI-2 questionnaire presents them as follows:
- Self-Confidence (9–36) indicates a favorable psychological state during preparation; Low 9–22, Moderate 23–33, and High 34–36 are the displayed bands.
- Somatic Anxiety (9–36) reflects autonomic responses such as increased temperature, racing heart, muscle tension, and sweating; Low 9–12, Moderate 13–21, and High 22–36 are shown.
- Cognitive Anxiety (9–36) assesses appraisals, expectations, and thought patterns; higher scores may indicate negative thoughts, self-doubt, and negative self-instructions; Low 9–13, Moderate 14–26, and High 27–36 are shown.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses four ordered response options, moving from an absent or weak fit to a strong or complete fit. Statements describe symptoms, concerns, or positive states, so the respondent should follow each item's wording rather than assume every statement represents anxiety. The questionnaire yields separate dimension scores; the displayed bands describe their levels, and no additional overall score or point-conversion rule should be inferred.
The evidence base is the published Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2), whose three-factor structure distinguishes the questionnaire's three domains. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument, not the original publication itself. Confirmatory factor analyses by Lane and colleagues and by Lundqvist and Hassmén examined the structure, including a Swedish version. Their findings support treating the domains as related but distinct, but do not establish independent norms for this online presentation.
A pre-competition anxiety assessment is context-sensitive because event stakes, recent training, mood, expectations, and self-awareness can influence self-report. The result is best read as a snapshot of current competitive experience, not a fixed trait or clinical conclusion.
- Martens, R., Burton, D., Vealey, R. S., Bump, L. A., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Development and validation of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2). In R. Martens, R. S. Vealey, & D. Burton (Eds.), Competitive Anxiety in Sport (pp. 117–213). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
- Lane, A. M., Sewell, D. F., Terry, P. C., Bartram, D., & Nesti, M. S. (1999). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17(6), 505–512. 10.1080/026404199365812
- Lundqvist, C., & Hassmén, P. (2005). Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2): Evaluating the Swedish version by confirmatory factor analyses. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(7), 727–736. 10.1080/02640410400021484
Updated: