Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
metacognition

Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance Test

Take the online Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how you manage thoughts and emotions in training and competition in about 7 minutes. Get clear, practical insights to boost focus, motivation, and resilience while reducing burnout risk.
Start Online Test
Questions: 367 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
31,932 views
2,308 completions
1,983 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
3/7
Metacognitive Experiences (ME)
Measures the emotional accompaniment of thinking during sports, such as confidence, clarity, and perceived difficulty while performing and self-regulating.
Low
Moderate
High
12.91: Low | 2.925.43: Moderate | 5.447: High
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of metacognitive experiences, suggesting generally stable but variable feelings of confidence and clarity during performance.
example score
3/7
Sport Performance Analysis and Evaluation (SPAaE)
Measures how well an athlete reflects on and evaluates their performance to consciously apply experience and improve effectiveness.
Low reflection
Moderate reflection
High reflection
14.29: Low reflection | 4.36.15: Moderate reflection | 6.167: High reflection
A score of 3 indicates a lower level of reflective analysis and performance evaluation, suggesting limited use of past experience to guide adjustments in training or competition.
example score
3/7
Error Monitoring (EM)
Measures how well an athlete notices mistakes and difficulties, analyzes them, and refocuses attention to regain effective performance.
Low monitoring
Moderate monitoring
High monitoring
12.84: Low monitoring | 2.855.26: Moderate monitoring | 5.277: High monitoring
A score of 3 indicates moderate error monitoring, suggesting you generally notice mistakes and can reorient attention, though consistency may vary under pressure.
example score
4/7
Pre-Performance Mindset Formation (PPMF)
Measures how effectively an athlete uses cognitive strategies to enter and maintain an optimal competitive mindset in the moment.
Developing mindset
Situational mindset
Consistent optimal mindset
13.87: Developing mindset | 3.886.07: Situational mindset | 6.087: Consistent optimal mindset
A score of 4 indicates a situational ability to set and hold an effective mindset, with strategies that work in some contexts but may be less consistent under pressure.
example score
4/7
Adaptation to Change (AtC)
Measures how well an athlete monitors the situation and flexibly applies prior experience to adapt to changing sport demands.
Low adaptability
Moderate adaptability
High adaptability
13.69: Low adaptability | 3.75.69: Moderate adaptability | 5.77: High adaptability
A score of 4 indicates moderate adaptability, suggesting the athlete can adjust to some changes but may not consistently apply flexible metacognitive monitoring in new conditions.
example score
4/7
Goal-Oriented Organization of Sport Activity (GOOoSA)
Measures how well an athlete sets personally meaningful goals and maintains a coherent athletic identity over time despite setbacks and uncertainty.
Low
Moderate
High
13.92: Low | 3.936.16: Moderate | 6.177: High
A score of 4 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally workable ability to organize goals around one’s athletic identity, with some inconsistency under pressure or uncertainty.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Competitive athletes under pressure
46%OF USERS
Athletes preparing for important competitions who want to manage focus, nerves, and decision-making when it matters most.
Coaches and sport psychologists
33%OF USERS
Practitioners who use the results to spot mental skill gaps and tailor training, feedback, and coping strategies.
Injury return and burnout risk
21%OF USERS
Athletes rebuilding confidence and consistency after setbacks who want to track emotions, motivation, and self-control in training.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Metacognitive experiences (Me)
Metacognitive experiences (Me)
Average
4.7
Normal range
3.75.8
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Analysis and Assessment of Diabetes Mellitus (AaAoDM)
Analysis and Assessment of Diabetes Mellitus (AaAoDM)
Average
4.5
Normal range
3.85.3
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Error Monitoring (EM)
Error Monitoring (EM)
Average
4.3
Normal range
3.55
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Setting the Mindset (StM)
Setting the Mindset (StM)
Average
2.5
Normal range
1.63.4
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Adaptation to Change (AtC)
Adaptation to Change (AtC)
Average
5.4
Normal range
4.46.3
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Target organization SD (ToS)
Target organization SD (ToS)
Average
3.5
Normal range
2.44.5
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Please indicate how accurately the statements below reflect your typical thoughts, feelings, and behaviors as an athlete. There are no right or wrong answers on this questionnaire. Please indicate how accurately the statements below reflect your typical thoughts, feelings, and behaviors as a female athlete. There are no right or wrong answers on this questionnaire.
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Absolutely disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Absolutely agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Metacognitive Components of Sports Activity Test

Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance Test - Symptoms and Signs

metacognition
sport

This measure assesses self-reported metacognitive processes relevant to training and competition. The Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance is intended to characterize how individuals monitor and manage their thoughts, attention, and emotional responses in sport settings. It was developed by John H. Flavell and Adrian P. Wells.

The questionnaire consists of 36 items and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete. Item content broadly reflects awareness of one’s thinking, regulatory strategies used to guide performance-relevant cognition and behavior, and subjective experiences associated with sport participation. The Metacognitive Components of Sport Performance may be used to support case conceptualization, identify potential targets for psychological skills interventions, and monitor perceived change over time when interpreted alongside other clinical and performance-relevant information.

Author: Adrian P. Wells, John H. Flavell
Literature: Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment