Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
metacognition

Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) Test

Take the online Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Learn how well you manage your thinking while working or studying in about 10 minutes. Get clear insight into planning, monitoring, and self-evaluation to sharpen learning and problem-solving.
Start Online Test
Questions: 5210 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
30,980 views
3,313 completions
1,943 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
125/260
Metacognitive Regulation Ability (MRA)
Measures how well a person consciously plans, monitors, and adjusts their thinking to regulate activity during learning or problem-solving.
Lower regulation
Moderate regulation
Higher regulation
52121: Lower regulation | 122191: Moderate regulation | 192260: Higher regulation
A score of 125 falls in the Moderate regulation range, suggesting a generally adequate ability to manage cognitive processes with some room to strengthen consistency across tasks.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

University and grad students
41%OF USERS
Students take it to understand how well they plan, monitor, and evaluate their thinking while studying for exams, writing papers, and learning complex material.
Teachers and tutors
34%OF USERS
Educators use it to assess learners’ self-regulation skills and adjust instruction to strengthen planning, monitoring, and reflection.
Working professionals upskilling
25%OF USERS
Professionals take it to spot gaps in how they manage their thinking during demanding tasks and improve problem-solving and learning at work.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Metacognitive Regulation Ability (MRA)
Metacognitive Regulation Ability (MRA)
Average
179.6
Normal range
144.2215.1
min.
52
max.
260
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

You are presented with a series of statements concerning characteristics of thinking and approaches to problem solving. Please rate these statements. Keep in mind that there are no right or wrong answers.
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Metacognitive Engagement in Activity, MAI Test

Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) Test - Symptoms and Signs

metacognition

This self-report measure is used to assess awareness and regulation of one’s own cognitive processes during learning and problem solving. The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) consists of 52 items and typically takes about 10 minutes to complete.

Items describe common metacognitive behaviors (e.g., planning, monitoring comprehension, and evaluating strategy use), with respondents indicating how characteristic each statement is of them. The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) may be used to support clinical, educational, or organizational assessment by providing a structured estimate of metacognitive self-regulation; results should be interpreted in context and in conjunction with other relevant information. Ann L. Brown is commonly cited in relation to foundational work in metacognition.

Author: Ann L. Brown, John H. Flavell
Literature: Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979.; Pintrich, P. R. The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice. 2002.; Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment