Servant Leadership Questionnaire (SLQ) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Cannot decide
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Slightly disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Slightly disagree
- Cannot decide
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Servant Leadership Questionnaire (SLQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People evaluating a leader’s servant-leadership behaviors may find the Servant Leadership Questionnaire (SLQ) Test useful. As a servant leadership assessment, it examines how leadership behaviors affect followers’ autonomy and development, ethical conduct, and community values. This focus connects leadership conduct with followers’ experience and their professional growth in everyday work.
What This Assessment Explores
This servant leadership questionnaire profiles:
- Ethical Behavior (4-28) measures moral conduct; Needs strengthening 4-13, Generally ethical 14-22, Strong ethical model 23-28.
- Conceptualization Skills (4-28) measures strategic thinking; Developing 4-13, Adequate 14-22, Strong 23-28.
- Establishing Community Values (4-28) measures shared values; Low 4-13, Moderate 14-22, High 23-28.
- Emotional Healing (4-28) measures emotional support; Low support 4-13, Moderate support 14-22, High support 23-28.
- Facilitating Growth and Success (4-28) measures development; Limited support 4-13, Moderate support 14-22, Strong support 23-28.
- Empowering Followers (4-28) measures autonomy; Low empowerment 4-13, Moderate empowerment 14-22, High empowerment 23-28.
- Putting the Follower First (4-28) measures follower priority; Low focus on followers 4-13, Balanced focus 14-22, Strong follower-first focus 23-28.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement describes a leadership behavior. The respondent chooses one of seven ordered options from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with a midpoint for uncertainty or neutrality. Items cover support, ethics, decisions, development, and community involvement.
Responses are organized into the seven displayed scales, and results appear separately through the supplied bands. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with SL-28 (Liden et al., 2008), a published multidimensional servant-leadership measure, but this online version is not presented as its adaptation; its bands are descriptive categories, and no normative standardization is stated.
Liden et al. (2015) validated a short form of the published SL-28, while Northouse presents the broader servant-leadership framework. This online questionnaire is only conceptually consistent with those sources.
Ratings can reflect the respondent’s relationship with the leader, selective memory, and impression management, so interpret the descriptive bands alongside concrete feedback and observed behavior. Using the displayed pattern from this servant leadership test, a respondent can reflect on the assessed leader’s behaviors across these dimensions.
- Liden, Robert C., Sandy J. Wayne, Hao Zhao, and David Henderson. "Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment." The Leadership Quarterly 19, no. 2 (2008): 161-177. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006
- Liden, Robert C., Sandy J. Wayne, Jeremy D. Meuser, Jia Hu, Junfeng Wu, and Chenwei Liao. "Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28." The Leadership Quarterly 26, no. 2 (2015): 254-269. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002
- Northouse, Peter G. Leadership: Theory and Practice. 9th ed. SAGE Publications, 2021.
Updated: