Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- This behavior is almost never a problem
- Sometimes this behavior is a problem
- This behavior is often a problem
- This behavior is almost never a problem
- This behavior is sometimes a problem
- This behavior is often a problem
- This is almost never a problem
- Sometimes this is a problem
- This is often a problem
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Test - Description and methodology of the test
Designed for an adult seeking a structured view of a child’s or adolescent’s everyday self-regulation, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) Test organizes observations around planning, emotional control, flexibility, and impulse management. An executive function assessment can reveal patterns in task completion and behavior for closer reflection.
What This Assessment Explores
The profile maps observed behavior rather than assigning a single label. It suits an adult reflecting on a young person's routines, school demands, relationships, and responses to change. Its executive functioning skills are grouped below:
- Validity: the Negativity Scale (0-9; typical 0-4, elevated 5-9) flags a negative response style that can color the rest of the profile.
- Reflective control: Cognitive Control, the Metacognition Index, and the General Executive Function Index (each 1-3) cover self-monitoring and global executive functioning.
- Organization: Organization of Materials, Plan/Organize, Working Memory, and Initiate (each 1-3) describe task setup, memory for instructions, and getting started.
- Regulation: the Behavioral Regulation Index, Emotional Control, Shift, and Inhibit (each 1-3) reflect emotional modulation, flexibility, and impulse control in daily settings.
These groupings keep the many subscales readable without flattening them into one headline score.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item presents a concrete behavior rated as almost never or rarely a problem, sometimes a problem, or often a problem. The format covers interrupting, forgetting, unfinished tasks, and difficulty with change.
Displayed results are scale scores rather than a single total. Since each scale has its own definition and bands, a higher number cannot be assumed to mean better or worse functioning across the profile. The displayed ranges do not reveal item weights.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with BRIEF (Gioia et al., 2000), the published framework most directly connected to these domains. Gioia et al. (2002) provide factor-analytic context, while Roth et al. (2015) show why norms require careful interpretation. These studies do not establish identical standardization for this online version.
As an executive function questionnaire, it is best read as an observer-based snapshot. Ratings may shift with the rater’s perspective, the young person’s current context, and the situations considered; it is not a diagnosis.
- Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). BRIEF: Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Retzlaff, P. D., & Espy, K. A. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in a clinical sample. Child Neuropsychology, 8(4), 249-257. 10.1076/chin.8.4.249.13513
- Roth, R. M., Erdodi, L. A., McCulloch, L. J., & Isquith, P. K. (2015). Much ado about norming: the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. Child Neuropsychology, 21(2), 225-233. 10.1080/09297049.2014.897318
Updated: