Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
metacognition

Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Test

Take the online Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how someone monitors and guides their own thinking in just 15 minutes. Get clear scores across key skills to spot strengths, blind spots, and practical growth areas for work or life.
Start Online Test
Questions: 8015 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
15,529 views
1,665 completions
1,441 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
49/70
Interactional (I)
Measures awareness of and ability to regulate one’s interactions with others during collaborative activities.
Developing
Adequate
Strong
1030: Developing | 3150: Adequate | 5170: Strong
A score of 49 falls in the Adequate range, suggesting generally effective monitoring and adjustment of interpersonal dynamics in teamwork, with some room to strengthen consistency in more demanding situations.
example score
47/70
Inhibitory (I)
Measures the ability to inhibit impulsive reactions and restrain undesirable actions during thinking and decision-making.
Low inhibition
Moderate inhibition
High inhibition
1029: Low inhibition | 3050: Moderate inhibition | 5170: High inhibition
A score of 47 falls in the Moderate inhibition range, suggesting generally adequate impulse control during thinking with occasional lapses under pressure or strong emotion.
example score
59/70
Monitoring (M)
Measures how well you track task progress, detect errors, and adjust actions during thinking and problem-solving.
Needs support
Adequate
Strong
1029: Needs support | 3049: Adequate | 5070: Strong
A score of 59 indicates strong monitoring, with consistent tracking of progress and timely correction when issues or errors arise.
example score
48/70
Procedural (P)
Measures how well a person monitors and controls the sequence of actions while performing tasks to build stable, automated skills.
Basic control
Developing control
Strong control
1030: Basic control | 3150: Developing control | 5170: Strong control
A score of 48 indicates developing procedural control, suggesting generally consistent step-by-step task execution with occasional need to recheck or adjust the action sequence.
example score
55/70
Meta-Emotional (ME)
Measures awareness of and ability to regulate one’s emotions during thinking and learning to support resilience and effective cognition.
Lower
Moderate
Higher
1029: Lower | 3049: Moderate | 5070: Higher
A score of 55 falls in the Higher range, suggesting strong awareness of emotions during cognitive tasks and generally effective emotional regulation while learning or problem-solving.
example score
40/70
Metacommunicative (M)
Measures awareness and regulation of communication processes to support effective interaction with others.
Developing
Functional
Advanced
1029: Developing | 3049: Functional | 5070: Advanced
A score of 40 indicates generally functional metacommunicative awareness and regulation, with some room to strengthen consistency and flexibility across different communication situations.
example score
50/70
Metaregulatory (M)
Measures how well a person monitors, manages, and adjusts their own thinking and task strategies to stay flexible and adapt to changing demands.
Limited metaregulation
Developing metaregulation
Strong metaregulation
1030: Limited metaregulation | 3150: Developing metaregulation | 5170: Strong metaregulation
A score of 50 indicates developing metaregulation, with generally effective self-management of cognitive activity while still benefiting from more consistent adjustment and flexibility in new or complex tasks.
example score
45/70
Metacognitive (M)
Measures how well a person can notice, reflect on, and regulate their own thinking to support planning and monitoring of cognitive activity.
Limited awareness
Developing awareness
Strong awareness
1029: Limited awareness | 3049: Developing awareness | 5070: Strong awareness
A score of 45 indicates developing metacognitive awareness, with generally reliable reflection on one’s thinking but room to strengthen consistent monitoring and adjustment of mental strategies.
example score
118/560
Metacognitive Potential (MP)
Measures overall capacity to monitor, control, and regulate one’s own thinking processes.
Low
Moderate
High
80239: Low | 240399: Moderate | 400560: High
A score of 118 falls in the Low range, suggesting currently limited metacognitive resources for consistent self-reflection and deliberate regulation of thinking.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Managers and team leads
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand how they plan, monitor decisions, manage emotions under pressure, and switch tasks effectively.
Students and researchers
34%OF USERS
They use it to see how well they track their learning, notice mistakes, and adjust study or research strategies.
Coaches and self-improvers
25%OF USERS
They take it to identify strengths and gaps in self-control, reflection, and goal-directed thinking for personal growth.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Interactional (I)
Interactional (I)
Average
41
Normal range
3052
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Inhibitory (I)
Inhibitory (I)
Average
30.8
Normal range
23.138.6
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Monitoring (M)
Monitoring (M)
Average
40
Normal range
31.848.3
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Procedural (P)
Procedural (P)
Average
50
Normal range
4060
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Meta-emotional (M)
Meta-emotional (M)
Average
47.8
Normal range
39.156.5
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacommunicative (M)
Metacommunicative (M)
Average
32.6
Normal range
23.242.1
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metaregulative (M)
Metaregulative (M)
Average
54.2
Normal range
45.163.3
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacognitive (M)
Metacognitive (M)
Average
50
Normal range
40.959
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacognitive Potential (MP)
Metacognitive Potential (MP)
Average
230.3
Normal range
165.8294.9
min.
80
max.
560
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Does not apply at all
    • Almost sure this does not apply
    • Applies less than it does not apply
    • Not sure
    • Applies more than it does not apply
    • Almost sure this applies
    • Completely applies
    • Not true at all
    • Fairly sure it is not true
    • More not true than true
    • Not sure
    • More true than not true
    • Fairly sure it is true
    • Completely true
    • Does not apply at all
    • Almost sure it does not apply
    • Rather does not apply than applies
    • Not sure
    • Rather applies than does not apply
    • Almost sure it applies
    • Completely applies to me
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire, COMP-U Test

Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs

metacognition

This instrument is designed to evaluate how an individual monitors and regulates their own thinking processes. The Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire provides a structured self-report approach to assessing metacognitive regulation and related capacities in a standardized format. Originally described by Adrian F. Wells.

The measure consists of 80 items and typically requires about 15 minutes to complete. Results are intended to support a profile of metacognitive strengths and vulnerabilities that may inform clinical formulation, psychoeducation, and treatment planning; the Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire is not a stand-alone diagnostic tool and should be interpreted in the context of other assessment data and the presenting concern.

Author: Adrian F. Wells
Literature: Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994.; Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979.; Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press. 1990.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment