Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
metacognition

Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Test

Take the online Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how you manage attention, analyze information, and regulate your thinking in about 15 minutes. 80 targeted items map eight skill areas to spotlight strengths and guide focused improvement.
Start Online Test
Questions: 8015 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
18,581 view
1,684 completions
1,236 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
37/70
Metacommunicative (M)
Measures awareness and regulation of communication processes and the ability to interpret others’ intentions.
Developing
Moderate
Strong
1029: Developing | 3049: Moderate | 5070: Strong
A score of 37 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting generally adequate metacommunicative awareness with room to further strengthen intentional regulation and interpretation in complex interactions.
example score
51/70
Self-Regulatory (SR)
Measures how well a person can independently regulate behavior and emotions while performing cognitively demanding tasks.
Needs support
Adequate
Strong
1030: Needs support | 3150: Adequate | 5170: Strong
A score of 51 falls in the Strong range, suggesting consistent self-management of attention, behavior, and emotional responses during cognitive activity.
example score
30/70
Endocognitive (E)
Measures the extent of internal self-observation and self-analysis that support self-awareness and self-regulation.
Lower
Moderate
Higher
1030: Lower | 3150: Moderate | 5170: Higher
A score of 30 falls in the Lower range, suggesting less frequent or less developed self-observation and self-analysis in information-related tasks compared with higher scores.
example score
45/70
Metaprocedural (M)
Measures awareness and control over the procedures and strategies you use while thinking and learning.
Limited procedural awareness
Developing strategy control
Strong strategy monitoring
1029: Limited procedural awareness | 3049: Developing strategy control | 5070: Strong strategy monitoring
A score of 45 falls in the Developing strategy control range, suggesting generally consistent awareness of learning/thinking strategies with some room to strengthen monitoring and adjustment.
example score
59/70
Metadeclarative (M)
Measures how well a person can recognize, describe, and use knowledge about their own cognitive processes to solve problems.
Developing
Functional
Well-developed
1030: Developing | 3150: Functional | 5170: Well-developed
A score of 59 falls in the Well-developed range, suggesting strong awareness and articulation of your thinking processes and an ability to apply that insight in problem-solving.
example score
37/70
Inhibitory (I)
Measures the ability to inhibit impulsive responses and suppress unwanted thoughts or actions during cognitive tasks.
Lower inhibition
Moderate inhibition
Higher inhibition
1029: Lower inhibition | 3049: Moderate inhibition | 5070: Higher inhibition
A score of 37 falls in the Moderate inhibition range, suggesting a generally adequate capacity to pause impulsive reactions, with room to strengthen consistency under distraction or pressure.
example score
48/70
Metaregulatory (M)
Measures how effectively you monitor, control, and adjust your thinking during problem solving to stay flexible and adapt to changing conditions.
Needs support
Developing
Strong
1029: Needs support | 3049: Developing | 5070: Strong
A score of 48 falls in the Developing range, suggesting generally adequate cognitive self-regulation with room to improve consistency and flexibility under changing task demands.
example score
41/70
Metacognitive (M)
Measures awareness of one’s own thinking and the ability to analyze, plan, and monitor cognitive activity.
Developing
Functional
Advanced
1030: Developing | 3150: Functional | 5170: Advanced
A score of 41 falls in the Functional range, suggesting generally adequate insight into your thought processes with room to strengthen consistent planning and self-monitoring.
example score
249/560
Metacognitive Potential (MP)
Metacognitive Potential measures how well a person can monitor, control, and regulate their own cognitive processes and thinking strategies.
Lower
Moderate
Higher
80239: Lower | 240399: Moderate | 400560: Higher
A score of 249 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally workable level of awareness and regulation of thinking with room for further development of self-monitoring and control strategies.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Managers and team leads
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand how they monitor their thinking, stay focused, and make higher-quality decisions under responsibility.
Students and lifelong learners
34%OF USERS
They use it to pinpoint which self-regulation and learning strategies help them study smarter and process information more effectively.
Psychologists and researchers
25%OF USERS
They administer it to assess metacognitive components in individuals or groups for diagnostics, coaching, or research purposes.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Metacommunicative (M)
Metacommunicative (M)
Average
26.9
Normal range
17.136.7
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Self-regulatory (S)
Self-regulatory (S)
Average
28.8
Normal range
19.238.3
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Endocognitive (E)
Endocognitive (E)
Average
48.3
Normal range
38.258.4
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metaprocedural (M)
Metaprocedural (M)
Average
51.7
Normal range
42.461.1
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metadeclarative (M)
Metadeclarative (M)
Average
28.4
Normal range
20.736
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Inhibitory (I)
Inhibitory (I)
Average
28.1
Normal range
20.635.5
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metaregulative (M)
Metaregulative (M)
Average
32.6
Normal range
24.940.3
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacognitive (M)
Metacognitive (M)
Average
32.3
Normal range
21.543
min.
10
max.
70
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Metacognitive Potential (MP)
Metacognitive Potential (MP)
Average
339.1
Normal range
250.1428.1
min.
80
max.
560
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Not true at all
    • Almost completely not true
    • More not true than true
    • Not sure
    • More true than not true
    • Almost completely true
    • Completely true
    • Does not apply at all
    • Almost certain this does not apply
    • More true than not true
    • Not sure
    • More true than not true
    • Almost certain this applies
    • Completely applies
    • Does not apply at all
    • Almost sure it does not apply
    • Rather does not apply than applies
    • Not sure
    • Rather applies than does not apply
    • Almost sure it applies
    • Completely applies
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Comprehensive Questionnaire of Metacognitive Potential, COMP-I Test

Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs

metacognition

This self-report measure is designed to assess metacognitive functioning, including how individuals monitor and regulate their thinking, attention, and cognitive strategies. The Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire provides a structured profile of perceived metacognitive strengths and areas for further support.

Attributed to Adrian F. Wells, it consists of 80 items and typically requires about 15 minutes to complete. The Comprehensive Metacognitive Potential Questionnaire may be used in clinical, counseling, or research contexts to characterize metacognitive capacities relevant to information processing and decision-making, and to inform case formulation or intervention planning when metacognitive regulation is a focus.

Author: Adrian F. Wells
Literature: Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979.; Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994.; Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press. 1990.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment